S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

What if 94 Oct gas makes big differences from Oct 91 gas?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-25-2012, 07:03 AM
  #11  
Registered User

 
rob-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,657
Received 170 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by INDYMAC
I think 91 octane is the minmum rating that should be used in the S2000 without causing engine damage. Is it the optimum rating for performance? Maybe for high altitude driving, but not lower elevations. I'm sure that some chart is in existence that guestimates optimum octane rating for high compression engines at a given elevation, but I don't have one.

In the Houston area it is not uncommon for fuel delivery traucks to dump leftover 87 octane gas into a 93 octane tank, rather than take it back to the terminal. The gas station owner pays the 87 price, and the customer never knows the difference. A win-win-lose situation IMO. But it happens.


For those of us that have owned our cars for awhile, we're pretty aware of when it runs well...even if it's a gut feeling and nothing else. If your gut tells you the 94 runs better than the 91, then go with your gut feelings.
FYI you can run 87 oc without doing any damage to the motor. Car will adjust timing and a/f ratio to protect itself. No modern car is damaged by a drop in octane. Huge write up a few years ago. Basically a 12:1 porche could run on 87. Most cars, including Honda, are built to be sold all over the world. Fuel qualities vary and as such they plan for these factors.

I've got two personal tests. A 2000 TL we ran for 100K on regular. No issues. Ran strong. A 05 RL 11:1 compression, has run for the last 60K on regular fuel. What's the major difference? Idle. It sounds a little ruffer. MPG? No affects. I'm able to get epa rating on the 87oc fuel +/- the margin of error.

So in effect, drive with what you want. Less power will be had with 87, stock power will be around 91 and no 'gains' will be had pushing a higher oc rated fuel on a stock block.

Food for thought - octane is probably the least of your concerns. Imagine getting some bad gas in there, maybe with some water and bringing the motor to redline and getting a little bit of 'extra stuff' thrown into the mix. I often wonder how the motor would handle that.
Old 03-25-2012, 09:55 PM
  #12  

 
Mezza's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Should be running 98 if you want power
Old 03-26-2012, 07:10 AM
  #13  

Thread Starter
 
sk429's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, I just don't want to be told that I am in need of mental exam
but when I switch from 91 to 94, I don't notice any differences so
it explains me why many drivers say it doesn't make differences.
If drivers think it is waste of money to use 94 or higher gas, they won't
use it at all.

However, I still believe ECU recognizes the extra octane from gas
and adapt it to the higher octane gas because if I switch from 94
to 91, it feels little bit different. After one or two full tank
with 91 gas, it seems to be OK, ECU probably adapt to 91 gas after that

I don't know for sure but I wouldn't want to get rid of the chance that
ecu probably recognize higher octane than 91 do something to take advantage of it.
Old 03-26-2012, 11:56 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Honda's ecu maps for S2000's are tuned on 95 octane. Actually all of their high performance cars have an ecu tuned for 95 octane. What happens is there are tables in the ecu that can tell based on the knock levels if you're running lower grade gasoline and automatically retard timing.

In essence, you will gain power all the way up to probably 100 octane fuel.

the knock sensor is there for extreme knock, and the Knock Index level tables are there for fuel differences anywhere from 91-95 octane.
Old 03-26-2012, 12:13 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
JackS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Really don't know the answer but the OM recs. 91 octane or higher. If 91 is or happens to be mid-grede in your area, try a tankful.
On the other hand, premium is at an average of 10 cents higher per gallon and a tankful would be $1.30/40 over the price of midgrade and about $6 per 1000miles. When viewed in this context, premium becomes an easier purchase. Your call.
Old 03-26-2012, 01:47 PM
  #16  
Registered User

 
SpitfireS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 17 ft below sea level.
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

IMO you will not gain power with a higher octane fuel, but you will not lose any when the engine - and the air it breaths in - is nice & warm, or at higher altitude.


And thanks for the link


Old 03-26-2012, 02:07 PM
  #17  

Thread Starter
 
sk429's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
Honda's ecu maps for S2000's are tuned on 95 octane. Actually all of their high performance cars have an ecu tuned for 95 octane. What happens is there are tables in the ecu that can tell based on the knock levels if you're running lower grade gasoline and automatically retard timing.

In essence, you will gain power all the way up to probably 100 octane fuel.

the knock sensor is there for extreme knock, and the Knock Index level tables are there for fuel differences anywhere from 91-95 octane.

Well, I think it make sense based on my subjective and personal feelings.
Anyway, do you know any articles or references about ecu mapping for 95 octane gas you mentioned above??
Old 04-04-2012, 01:06 PM
  #18  
Community Organizer

 
alSpeed2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The 604
Posts: 10,590
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

How can one measure the difference between 91 & 94? Can a flashpro do it? If so, how would we know the difference is not due to a margin of error.

Also, fwiw, Chevron 94 up here does not contain any ethanol.
Old 04-04-2012, 01:16 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by alSpeed2k
How can one measure the difference between 91 & 94? Can a flashpro do it? If so, how would we know the difference is not due to a margin of error.

Also, fwiw, Chevron 94 up here does not contain any ethanol.

The engine knows based on knock level. NOT KNOCK COUNTS, but knock level.
Old 04-04-2012, 08:38 PM
  #20  

 
darcyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: um, a house
Posts: 4,254
Received 358 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

i like the 94 in the hot summer months...again as stated above...keeps the car from pulling timing out and the car from falling flat...my 2000 Si is notoriously bad in the 100 degree heat with the A/C on.

darcy
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sk429
Vancouver BC S2000 Owners
34
01-20-2013 12:54 PM
boltonblue
New England S2000 Owners
4
02-27-2009 08:24 PM
HonCBRf2
Delaware Valley S2000 Members
2
09-15-2008 12:42 PM
Drkphnx
San Diego S2000 Owners
7
12-28-2007 08:27 PM
mintswack
Car and Bike Talk
17
12-01-2005 02:45 PM



Quick Reply: What if 94 Oct gas makes big differences from Oct 91 gas?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM.