S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Vafc 2 setting for a STOCK s2000

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-26-2004, 06:21 AM
  #11  
Former Moderator

 
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 37,187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

to a point... I mostly got the VAFC for future use for other parts and to lean out my fuel a little bit since im running a 00 model with the richer running ecu. But 100 rpm seems pretty worthless to me. About the downfalls of lowering VTEC besides fuel correction, like you said the ecu doesn't think it's in VTEC when it is with oil pressure etc is a reason enough for me to leave it as is, lowering of disengagement really isn't something I'm too worried about, if I'm really driving that hard and shifting where I am suppose to be I'll never drop out of it anyway...... but at WOT in case I shift early its nice to know there is a small window in which it will stay engaged vs the factory setting. Very valid points you made about what the VAFC doesn't see that the stock ECU does.
Old 05-26-2004, 06:26 AM
  #12  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I see your point, but my only reason for using the VTEC portion of the V-AFC is to make the VTEC engagement as smooth as possible. To make it smooth, I had to lower VTEC 300 RPMs to 5600. Not only did I gain a significant amount of power through those 300 RPMs, but I don't have to worry about the abrupt VTEC kick when I'm accelerating out of a corner on the track. When you are at the ragged edge of grip on the track, it doesn't take much to send you off into the weeds.
Old 05-26-2004, 06:35 AM
  #13  
Former Moderator

 
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 37,187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ahh...yea well 300 RPM's is bigger significance than 100, I was just referring to 100 only. I know what ya mean, I've been attending some autox's lately but not competed yet. When driving that hard it doesn't take much of anything to lose it. Just a minor surface change can send you in a spin as I saw this weekend. How much fuel correcting did you end up doing for the lower xover?
Old 05-26-2004, 06:44 AM
  #14  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I built a custom VTEC / fuel controller to replace my V-AFC. It tunes itself using a WBO2 input, so I don't really know what my corrections are.
Old 05-26-2004, 07:04 AM
  #15  
Former Moderator

 
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 37,187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

for being that smart..... I wish I understood that stuff to that extent.
Old 05-26-2004, 01:24 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
lyndon_h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Dark_Sub_Rosa
for being that smart..... I wish I understood that stuff to that extent.

But at least your cats are cute.
Old 05-26-2004, 02:02 PM
  #17  
Registered User

 
ASMspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: West Coast
Posts: 9,214
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by gernby
I see your point, but my only reason for using the VTEC portion of the V-AFC is to make the VTEC engagement as smooth as possible.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikeabtin
S2000 Talk
4
06-28-2009 05:56 PM
fishs2000
S2000 Modifications and Parts
8
08-30-2008 05:45 PM
blackfx35
S2000 Forced Induction
4
02-19-2006 10:46 PM
WayneTeK
S2000 Talk
13
03-14-2005 01:00 PM
bobatimez
S2000 Talk
2
04-05-2001 05:28 AM



Quick Reply: Vafc 2 setting for a STOCK s2000



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:05 AM.