UOA of LE 1605
#21
Registered User
Thread Starter
Still waiting on my reference sample test results. The lab said the TAN came in too high, so they were re-running the test. Maybe the reddish purple dye makes this test difficult.
#22
Registered User
Thread Starter
OK, I think we have a winner. Of the five samples I sent to the Houston lab last week, this one appears to be the only report with no obvious errors. I must have gotten the rookie Tech on the others! The first sample line is the reference sample of 1605, and the second sample line is the used oil:
[attachment=25709:LE 1605 S2000 65K.pdf]
[attachment=25709:LE 1605 S2000 65K.pdf]
#23
Registered User
Thread Starter
Here is my most recent Polaris UOA of 1605 in the S2000. 6/21/2014 sample after almost 2 years and 7,146 miles/72,406 total. Reference oil is 2nd number:
Iron 17/1
Chromium 0/0
Nickel 1/0
Aluminum 0/0
Copper 0/0
Lead 0/0
Tin 3/0
Cadmium 0/0
Silver 0/0
Vanadium 0/0
Silicon 3/0
Sodium 1/0
Potassium 0/0
Titanium 0/0
Molybdenum 0/3
Antimony 1/0
Manganese 0/0
Lithium 0/1
Boron 38/88
Magnesium 3/0
Calcium 6/6
Barium 0/0
Phosphorus 1060/1154
Zinc 6/4
Water <0.1%
V100C 20.1 cSt/V40C 222 cSt
TAN 2.26/1.78
Iron 17/1
Chromium 0/0
Nickel 1/0
Aluminum 0/0
Copper 0/0
Lead 0/0
Tin 3/0
Cadmium 0/0
Silver 0/0
Vanadium 0/0
Silicon 3/0
Sodium 1/0
Potassium 0/0
Titanium 0/0
Molybdenum 0/3
Antimony 1/0
Manganese 0/0
Lithium 0/1
Boron 38/88
Magnesium 3/0
Calcium 6/6
Barium 0/0
Phosphorus 1060/1154
Zinc 6/4
Water <0.1%
V100C 20.1 cSt/V40C 222 cSt
TAN 2.26/1.78
#24
Here is my most recent Polaris UOA of 1605 in the S2000. 6/21/2014 sample after almost 2 years and 7,146 miles/72,406 total. Reference oil is 2nd number:
Iron 17/1
Chromium 0/0
Nickel 1/0
Aluminum 0/0
Copper 0/0
Lead 0/0
Tin 3/0
Cadmium 0/0
Silver 0/0
Vanadium 0/0
Silicon 3/0
Sodium 1/0
Potassium 0/0
Titanium 0/0
Molybdenum 0/3
Antimony 1/0
Manganese 0/0
Lithium 0/1
Boron 38/88
Magnesium 3/0
Calcium 6/6
Barium 0/0
Phosphorus 1060/1154
Zinc 6/4
Water <0.1%
V100C 20.1 cSt/V40C 222 cSt
TAN 2.26/1.78
Iron 17/1
Chromium 0/0
Nickel 1/0
Aluminum 0/0
Copper 0/0
Lead 0/0
Tin 3/0
Cadmium 0/0
Silver 0/0
Vanadium 0/0
Silicon 3/0
Sodium 1/0
Potassium 0/0
Titanium 0/0
Molybdenum 0/3
Antimony 1/0
Manganese 0/0
Lithium 0/1
Boron 38/88
Magnesium 3/0
Calcium 6/6
Barium 0/0
Phosphorus 1060/1154
Zinc 6/4
Water <0.1%
V100C 20.1 cSt/V40C 222 cSt
TAN 2.26/1.78
LE1605 continues to impress me beyond anything I would have expected. Amazing report
#26
Registered User
Thread Starter
#27
it was actually 666ppm with 4300 miles.
You saw it already.....in this thread
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/107...iff-and-trans/
i actually feel better now, I was thinking less than 20ppm iron was average but its actually 388ppm so I feel better about mine now, and am jealous of your 16ppm.
You saw it already.....in this thread
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/107...iff-and-trans/
i actually feel better now, I was thinking less than 20ppm iron was average but its actually 388ppm so I feel better about mine now, and am jealous of your 16ppm.
#28
Registered User
Thread Starter
it was actually 666ppm with 4300 miles.
You saw it already.....in this thread
https://www.s2ki.com/...diff-and-trans/
i actually feel better now, I was thinking less than 20ppm iron was average but its actually 388ppm so I feel better about mine now, and am jealous of your 16ppm.
You saw it already.....in this thread
https://www.s2ki.com/...diff-and-trans/
i actually feel better now, I was thinking less than 20ppm iron was average but its actually 388ppm so I feel better about mine now, and am jealous of your 16ppm.
Good luck!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mannn
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
50
04-17-2004 03:15 PM