S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Uneven camber

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-23-2006, 07:48 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jakup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincy, Ohio
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Uneven camber

Will having uneven right/left camber make the handling unpredictable?
The reason I ask is I got my car alligned today, and told them to get it as close to stock as possible. The front worked out fine, but on the rear they got one side to -1.7* and the other side to -2.1*. I realize this is a bit more aggressive than stock specs and will lead to more tire wear, which I'm fine with, but I was just worried that having closer to stock on the left and more aggressive on the right would lead to unpredictable handling.
Old 08-23-2006, 09:17 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
INDYMAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

It can be, and should be the same with you sitting in the car. It will affect your handling. That's an unacceptable alignment for the family station wagon, let alone an S2000!
Old 08-23-2006, 09:35 AM
  #3  
Ek9
Banned
 
Ek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd want both sides to be close to the same. I'm doubtful you'll notice much additional tire wear at 2.1* versus 1.7 . I'd have gotten the alignment shop to make them the same.

Stock is -1.5* +- .5 (if I read it correctly).
Old 08-23-2006, 10:30 AM
  #4  
Registered User

 
Wildncrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,771
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have my driver's side done .2 of a degree less because when I found that when I sit in the car that I add .2 of a degree of camber to that side.

This way I have even camber when I drive.

So if you don't get uneven camber from the alignment tech you have uneven alignment when you drive.
Old 08-23-2006, 10:37 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jakup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincy, Ohio
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what you're saying is that your weight lowers the car a bit and changes the camber by .2*. So say I have -1.7* on my driver side, does this mean I'll be at roughly -1.9*, or -1.5* (considering all factors were the same as yours, which I'm sure they're not, just wondering hypothetically). I'd assume lowering it would increase the amount of negative camber, thus being ~-1.9*, but I just wanted to confirm.
Old 08-23-2006, 10:52 AM
  #6  
Registered User

 
SpitfireS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 17 ft below sea level.
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Jakup Posted on Aug 23 2006, 05:48 PM
.... and told them to get it as close to stock as possible..... on the rear they got one side to -1.7* and the other side to -2.1*.
IMO that is not "close to stock".
As Ek9 pointed out stock rear camber is -1.5 degree +- 0.5 degree.
So on one side you are out of stock range.

If you are not lowered or anything they should be able to get it to stock specs and equal.
It may take more time.. but you paid $$ to get it done.
So they have to do it right.
IMO.

Old 08-23-2006, 02:31 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jakup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincy, Ohio
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpitfireS,Aug 23 2006, 02:52 PM
Jakup Posted on Aug 23 2006, 05:48 PM

IMO that is not "close to stock".
As Ek9 pointed out stock rear camber is -1.5 degree +- 0.5 degree.
So on one side you are out of stock range.

If you are not lowered or anything they should be able to get it to stock specs and equal.
It may take more time.. but you paid $$ to get it done.
So they have to do it right.
IMO.

Well I am lowered, which is why they said they couldn't get it to the stock specs, which is understandable. I was just wondering if having 1.7* on one side and 2.1* on the other is going to be ok, or is it going to cause a problem.
Old 08-23-2006, 03:28 PM
  #8  
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
 
Slows2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mother F'in TN
Posts: 44,287
Received 352 Likes on 321 Posts
Default

The camber changes with the rear toe. If the rear toe was out of adjustment range, they may not be able to hit the camber #.

If the car has been lowered more than an inch you'll probably never be able to get the stock camber setting.
Old 08-23-2006, 03:52 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jakup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincy, Ohio
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slows2k,Aug 23 2006, 07:28 PM
The camber changes with the rear toe. If the rear toe was out of adjustment range, they may not be able to hit the camber #.

If the car has been lowered more than an inch you'll probably never be able to get the stock camber setting.
I know, I'm fine with it not being stock camber. What I was worried about was it being different left-right.
Old 08-23-2006, 06:13 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Joel S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pakantot naman oh!!!
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think u can get a little closer than that...to me thats a bit too far apart from each other. You really dont have to get them back to stock, -2 to -2.5 on rears are not bad at all. The main reason why the tires are getting eatin out is because of the toe. If the toe is out of wach then more than likely the car will not handle good on high speed. I would recommend you doin the euro spec if possible. They are fairly aggressive but not that aggressive to eat the tires pretty bad


Quick Reply: Uneven camber



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:15 AM.