Spoon Sports B&B crate motor DYNO RESULTS!

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

10-23-2004, 12:19 AM

#21

Rieger328Ci

Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2001

Location: Cupertino

Posts: 425

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Hmmm... must be the RS*R exhaust! J/k

Congrats! 250rwhp is way up there for NA

10-23-2004, 02:09 AM

#22

Gernby

Former Sponsor

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 15,526

Likes: 0

Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

I would be interested to know what other S2000s were putting down on that same dyno. I would also like to see a better scale on the A/F ratio. It doesn't look like it was even tuned. There is no doubt in my mind that you could pick up significant power by lowering VTEC (and tuning properly). You should also be able to keep the power almost flat after peak.

10-23-2004, 02:15 AM

#23

smccurry

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2001

Location: Honolulu

Posts: 4,562

Likes: 1

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Awesome!!

10-23-2004, 02:41 AM

#24

808style

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Location: da 808 state

Posts: 2,363

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

those are some freakin' awesome numbers!

10-23-2004, 07:19 AM

#25

VeilsideAP1

Registered User

Thread Starter

Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: Orlando

Posts: 2,895

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by gernby,Oct 23 2004, 05:09 AM

other s2000s he had on their dyno were all at or below 200hp. As for tuning, believe me, we tried. Whenever anything was done, the peak HP WOULD increase, but the curve went to hell... same with lowering the VTEC crossover... so in short, it wasn't tuned... just shaved a little fuel off top end... If you have any doubts about thier credentials or abilities to "tune properly," give em a call...

Socrates, well, I don't think I'll be doing ITBs...

As bad as it sounds, I'm really contemplating getting a supercharger and seeing what happens...

Thanks for all the support guys!! This was really an expensive crap shoot for me, and at no time did I expect these numbers. I knew the car was faster, but I didn't know if I had just gotten a crap motor for the first one, or if the car was actually signifigantly faster then a "perfect stock" motor...

10-23-2004, 09:36 AM

#26

SocratesDTC

Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Location: Athens/Attiki

Posts: 1,176

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

This is a N1 motor by the way. Are you sure that Forced Induction is the correct way to go?

I would really like to see what is going to happen, if you go N/A.

good luck with your motor! Dont forget us when you buy the BADA$$ charger

10-23-2004, 12:49 PM

#27

Shaun@SG

Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 93

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

What is the displacement of this engine that is making 250whp? Does it not equate to roughly 295 crank hp? On a 2.0 that would be amazing because it is close to Touring car specific outputs of around 150hp/litre.