SC'ed? Is it the way to go..
#41
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Blowing a motor has nothing to do with the method of forced induction.......
Superchargers are more mild and generally produce less pressure unless you do alot of modifications. Turbochargers are alot easier to inexperienced people to produce more boost.
The motor doesn't care where it gets it's air from, but if it gets too much, or it's not tuned for that amount of pressure then it's not going to last.
Chris
Superchargers are more mild and generally produce less pressure unless you do alot of modifications. Turbochargers are alot easier to inexperienced people to produce more boost.
The motor doesn't care where it gets it's air from, but if it gets too much, or it's not tuned for that amount of pressure then it's not going to last.
Chris
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cjb80,Sep 6 2004, 08:06 AM
Blowing a motor has nothing to do with the method of forced induction.......
Superchargers are more mild and generally produce less pressure unless you do alot of modifications. Turbochargers are alot easier to inexperienced people to produce more boost.
The motor doesn't care where it gets it's air from, but if it gets too much, or it's not tuned for that amount of pressure then it's not going to last.
Chris
Superchargers are more mild and generally produce less pressure unless you do alot of modifications. Turbochargers are alot easier to inexperienced people to produce more boost.
The motor doesn't care where it gets it's air from, but if it gets too much, or it's not tuned for that amount of pressure then it's not going to last.
Chris
-Alan
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cjb80,Sep 6 2004, 08:06 AM
Blowing a motor has nothing to do with the method of forced induction.......
Superchargers are more mild and generally produce less pressure unless you do alot of modifications. Turbochargers are alot easier to inexperienced people to produce more boost.
The motor doesn't care where it gets it's air from, but if it gets too much, or it's not tuned for that amount of pressure then it's not going to last.
Chris
Superchargers are more mild and generally produce less pressure unless you do alot of modifications. Turbochargers are alot easier to inexperienced people to produce more boost.
The motor doesn't care where it gets it's air from, but if it gets too much, or it's not tuned for that amount of pressure then it's not going to last.
Chris
The only reason you may think a S/C is safer is because you can never get into boost until way later in the rpm range. Where as most turbo kits out will produce boost in daily driven situations. So there's less of a danger zone time period. Heck, the S/C kits out of the box run dangerously lean. Also, you dont hear too many turbo kits now-a-days giving people problems. Pretty much because a lot of things got sorted out. The original turbo kit companies didn't have the funding to do the R&D like comptech or vortech have. Now that things have been pretty well sorted, I feel pretty confident saying that buying a turbo kit and running low boost (7psi) with proper engine management and tunning will probably be safer on the motor than a S/C. Either case it's more fun
A FPR is probably the worst way to run a turbo'ed car especially with a motor so senstive to tune because of it's compression like the S2000's. So don't count the kits that use those
#45
[QUOTE=Blkturbos2k,Sep 5 2004, 05:59 AM]Let me put it a way they can understand, Ill race any S/C s2k thats @ 8lbs,no n2o, Ill run 8lbs and I will hand them there ass.
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sideways,Sep 6 2004, 12:06 PM
Bottom line: If your driving is unable to keep the car in the VTEC power band then a turbo is a good way to make up for it.
#48
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know this is a stupid story, but I gotta tell it.
One time I was racing a Cobra, when I had a built motor, and the my second turbo setup (turbo up front of motor) and I mis shifted from second to FIFTH gear, ground, then got it in and floored it and still beat him. heheheh
Chris
One time I was racing a Cobra, when I had a built motor, and the my second turbo setup (turbo up front of motor) and I mis shifted from second to FIFTH gear, ground, then got it in and floored it and still beat him. heheheh
Chris
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blkturbos2k,Sep 5 2004, 05:59 AM
Let me put it a way they can understand, Ill race any S/C s2k thats @ 8lbs,no n2o, Ill run 8lbs and I will hand them there ass. Now you understand? The S/C has so much more lag then a turbo ever will. They dont make any power till 6000rpms. Jason00s2000, I assume you have never been in a turboed s2k. I make 75 MORE RWHP then YOU @ 5500rpms, Now who has the lag little slow one
Spankee, They just dont understand?
They get a S/C and now there fast
Spankee, They just dont understand?
They get a S/C and now there fast
Also, don't call me little slow one. I have a 686 rwhp Supra in my garage that can show you what's up.
#50
Originally Posted by Jason00S2000,Sep 9 2004, 04:59 AM
Also, don't call me little slow one. I have a 686 rwhp Supra in my garage that can show you what's up.
Where's wantone and his pics when you need 'im...