S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

SC vs. Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-10-2004, 06:17 PM
  #81  
Moderator

 
AusS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30,811
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

If you lie (and it has been proven you do) then you will be called a 'lier'. Simple as that.

I suggest you look at the history of my responses to you. I started off by correcting your statement about the prices of used SCs but didn't knock you or your sale.

When you insisted that your claims were true in the face of evidence to the contrary you made the step from misinformed to lier.

It wasn't until you deliberately misrepresented me that I alluded to you being a (edited by xviper) and persist in proving this label is justly deserved.

I may insult people, but I don't lie and mislead. I don't use false information to further a sale that could potentially lead to another member blowing their engine.
Old 05-10-2004, 06:24 PM
  #82  

 
honda9krpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by s2000turbo
AusS2000
You are the # 5 at the forum and you insult members WOW
Wow #5 congratulations!
(edited by xviper)
Wow another observation similar to mine
watch it buddy he has got 440cc and emanage and an "editing" personality

(please don't fan the flames - )
Old 05-10-2004, 06:26 PM
  #83  

 
xviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Easy fellas. Keep it "robust" but no name calling.
I'm watching.
Old 05-10-2004, 06:35 PM
  #84  
Moderator

 
AusS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30,811
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

H9k, you and I have an ongoing stouse, but if you can put that aside for a second I'd be very interested in your POV on S2000turbo's kit and tuning method. I mean, that is what this is about isn't it.
Old 05-10-2004, 07:01 PM
  #85  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
fperra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by AusS2000
H9k, you and I have an ongoing stouse, but if you can put that aside for a second I'd be very interested in your POV on S2000turbo's kit and tuning method. I mean, that is what this is about isn't it.
Not really. Its about whether turbo's are any more unreliable than SC's. Lets get back to the subject and leave this bickering to the "For Sale" forum.
Old 05-10-2004, 09:39 PM
  #86  
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
 
Slows2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mother F'in TN
Posts: 44,287
Received 352 Likes on 321 Posts
Default

The Turbo or SC are not the unreliable component. The sketchy fuel and timing controls are.

That being said, I still prefer the split second timing controller over the e-manage.
Old 05-11-2004, 04:24 AM
  #87  

 
honda9krpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by AusS2000
H9k, you and I have an ongoing stouse, but if you can put that aside for a second I'd be very interested in your POV on S2000turbo's kit and tuning method. I mean, that is what this is about isn't it.
I have no idea how he setted up his black box/eleectronics, about his AF ratio, his turbo, dynograph, timing, compression or EGT......why would I want to make any comment about his tuning.

Please don't drag me into a discussion about someone else tuning technique when you and I prob don't know the complere nity gritty details. You might be able to do so with lack of this detail information but I certainly like all the facts presented before making my judgement. Otherwise I may end up like you making incorrect judgement about timing advance with the vafc in a votech sc car.
Old 05-11-2004, 04:55 AM
  #88  
Moderator

 
AusS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30,811
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Well the facts are plain to see. He is advocating 6-7 psi turbo set up with Vortech FMU, a MAP Limiter and nothing else. Not even uprated fuel pump.

Originally posted by s2000turbo
The Fuel Magnament is included in the kit, is a Vortech 12:1

The "black box" is a electronic device that send a signal to the computer of the car, to not detect boost, that is the black box for, that it,
My stand is that this is a recipe for disaster. What's yours?
Old 05-11-2004, 05:48 AM
  #89  
Registered User

 
EssTooKayTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 6,349
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd still like to know:

Pros and Cons of Turbo and SC.

Cost, reliability, ease of installtion/use/maintenance...

ratings on a scale of 1-10 would even be more informative for those of us, still trying to decide.

Thanks,
Tom
Old 05-11-2004, 06:27 AM
  #90  

 
honda9krpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bdiddy


Quick Reply: SC vs. Turbo



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:17 PM.