S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

SC vs. Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-30-2004, 11:55 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
E-Heezy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clifton, VA;Arlington, VA
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Slows2k
Or is it just less turbo cars?
I agree with this thought. It seems as though the people who are going turbo these days are making custom kits. This is possibly the result of companies like Spool and Speedcraft not being around anymore (for different reasons). It seems people are very skeptical of the new kit(s) on the market and want to wait and see how they perform over the long haul, for good reason.

It took me over a year and more money than I would like to mention to get my turbo running well. However, I couldn't be happier with it now that it has been properly tuned.
Old 04-30-2004, 03:03 PM
  #12  
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
 
Slows2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mother F'in TN
Posts: 44,287
Received 352 Likes on 321 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by JohnChan
Old 04-30-2004, 06:37 PM
  #13  

 
bigpurp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,831
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Slows2k
Old 04-30-2004, 06:52 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
dave22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 13,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 05-03-2004, 04:53 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
jahwerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Long Valley
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Could be that not everyone posts their issues too.

I personally opted for turbo w/ AEM EMS, went with a conservative tune, and have not experienced any issues yet, BUT I've only run through about 10 tanks of gas since going FI. I can say that my plugs look great and the oil is still an amber color, and hasn't needed any topping off.

Time will tell. There are probably fewer than 5 or 10 people running turbos as long as some of the initial SC folks, and as we all know, there were some failures and lessons learned in the early days that anyone starting on a project today should heed.
Old 05-03-2004, 06:38 AM
  #16  
Registered User

 
TurboVtk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bronxville/NY
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

there are not many turbo cars, because in most cases its more expensive, harder and more expensive to tune also.

Only the brave souls dare go turbo. and are very nicely rewarded with whp/tq numbers that sc's dream about. j/k
Old 05-03-2004, 10:54 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
dave22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 13,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by TurboVtk
Old 05-03-2004, 10:56 AM
  #18  

 
bigpurp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,831
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by dave22
Old 05-04-2004, 01:25 PM
  #19  

 
ayelien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On Lake St. Clair in Fair Haven MI
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting stuff. Check this out. The parent company I work for is developing what they call the "Super Turbo". I combines both a turbo and supercharger in the same system to give both low end and high end power. The prototyope I saw was in an Audi.
Old 05-04-2004, 01:32 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Dolemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: High Point
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are people who have already run a supercharged+Turbocharged setup. Purely custom by all means, how reliable it was and how they did it, i have NO idea. I just know its been done before, but never for retail. That would be quite interesting to see how that works.


Quick Reply: SC vs. Turbo



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 AM.