S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Are RPMs Why Our Cars Are Inefficient?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-17-2009, 03:49 PM
  #31  
Registered User

 
sahtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by moogleii,Nov 17 2009, 02:20 PM
I'm not sure why you're getting so many defensive responses, but i'm pretty sure the answer is "yes."

If we had a taller 6, we'd get more mpg. Once you're cruising, you don't even need to be at peak torque, either. It would suck at the track though.

And yaeh, cutting your cruise speed would help greatly. I cruise at 80-85, and my mileage is about 20-21 (well, with mixed driving, I have no huge commutes).
Me neither.

Ralleh, one thing worth noting that has not yet been discussed is that the angle of our windshields is unusually steep. This is due to several factors you can look up (safety being one of them). Aerodynamics have an exponential relationship in top speed etc. functions. With our unusually steep windshield, it is quite possible that cruising at "sports car" speeds of say 80-85 really degrades fuel mileage.

Another is that as you reach the peak of any engine's output capacity, fuel mileage tends to decrease slightly beyond just a linear relationship with the horsepower gained.

Whether it's due to excessive heat, higher compression, the tighter gearing used in most of the aforementioned, is not always consistent.

Overall, you ask a decent question. I've wondered the same thing when you see EPA estimates of 26mpg highway for a 2900 lbs 2.0 ltr 240hp/160tq honda and 29mpg highway for a 4400 lbs 4.6 ltr nearly 400hp/400+tq lexus barge.

The excellent aero's, gearing, and relatively little output in proportion to max output needed to sustain highway speeds of the c6 supports the above argument as well.
Old 11-17-2009, 04:44 PM
  #32  
Registered User

 
iDomN8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7,430
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Here is honda's except on the s2000:
At first sight of the S2000 you feel a connection. A connection to Honda's long heritage of racing success on the world's most demanding circuits, to the 70 Grand Prix victories in Formula 1 and the 65 victories in CART. That's because the S2000 wasn't just "inspired" by racing, it was fine-tuned by Honda's racing engineers on the high-speed straightaways, breathtaking sweepers and tight hairpins of Suzuka. You'll feel the S2000's racing pedigree the moment you slip behind the wheel. The gauges and controls are prominent and logically placed, creating an intuitive driver interface that's intimate, yet comfortable. High-bolstered perforated leather seats cradle and brace you for quick manoeuvres, while the audio system with speakers behind the headrest provides the ideal soundtrack for your drive. As the bright digital tach arcs rapidly clockwise, you get an advanced lesson in acceleration. And the harder you push the S2000, with its new Drive-by-Wire Throttle System™, the more you realize this car was built to respond.


Here is the except on the Insight:
The 2010 Honda Insight. Yes it's a hybrid. But beyond its ultra low emissions, fuel efficiency and fun-to-drive nature, its unique Eco Assist™ system with ECON mode can actually make you a more environmentally friendly driver. Moreover, the Insight represents another innovative step that we can all take towards a brighter future with blue skies for our children.

The Insight's unique ECO Assist™ technology modifies various vehicle systems to minimize your overall energy use and maximize your fuel efficiency – all at the push of the ECON button. Plus with the Eco Guide feedback system, the Insight actually encourages you to become a more fuel-efficient driver. The system monitors your immediate driving habits and shows you how efficiently you are accelerating, braking, or cruising by changing the speedometer background colour from blue to green. The Eco Guide also features a long term cumulative scoring system located in your Multi-Information Display that rewards you with green "leaves" as your driving performance improves overtime.

Maybe you thought you bought a Insight?
Old 11-17-2009, 06:09 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
bradskee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When i drove to tuscon from san diego this last weekend i averaged 34.6 mpgs at a cruise controlled 70 mph the whole way. I was suprised and elated.
Old 11-17-2009, 06:13 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
S2kracka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Colony, TX
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My S2k got way better fuel mileage than my Evo does. I used to get over 30 on the hwy and average mid-20's in mixed driving.
Old 11-17-2009, 06:31 PM
  #35  
Registered User

 
YELLOW JACKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Face it. this car was designed with performance in mind, not economy. you could juggle gear ratios, but that could get costly. not sure what would be a good solution for your quest for better mileage. but if you find one, post it. i'm sure others with the same delima would like to know. good luck!
Old 11-17-2009, 06:51 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
bluAP1s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lexington Park, MD
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YELLOW JACKET,Nov 17 2009, 07:31 PM
Face it. this car was designed with performance in mind, not economy. you could juggle gear ratios, but that could get costly. not sure what would be a good solution for your quest for better mileage. but if you find one, post it. i'm sure others with the same delima would like to know. good luck!
the solution is simple, Don't worry about it, if you want good gas mileage get another car.

Sorry but this guy seems hung up on gearing even though other logical reasoning behind the poor gas mileage has been discussed.

It sounds to me, and I could be wrong, that he sees the car as inefficient simply because of the gas mileage. This is just not the type of efficiency honda had in mind when designing the S. They were focused on efficiency in terms of power output for a NA 2.0 L or 2.2L 4 cylinder engine.

The aerodynamics were sacrificed for safety because the engineers considered safety to be a higher priority than gas mileage.

In the end this question being asked is just simply a result of, the car wasn't built for that.
Old 11-17-2009, 09:15 PM
  #37  

 
fatjoe10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NOVA
Posts: 1,424
Received 95 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

OP: you got PM
Old 11-18-2009, 12:55 AM
  #38  
Registered User

 
DFWs2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

it's not simple to swap a 1st and 6th gear from one tranny to a different tranny (i'm talking about ap1 to ap2, not ap1 to ap1). the relationships between the gears are more complex than 1->2->3, etc. (AFAIK)

you would most likely end up spending so much time/money on that pursuit, that it would almost assuredly end up being cheaper to buy some custom tranny with the ratios you think you want.

the more "efficient" way of doing what you kind of want would be to have 2 differentials. one with normal final drive for normal driving, and one with a "lower" (say 3.10 instead of 4.10) final drive for long trips.
Old 11-18-2009, 05:48 AM
  #39  

 
thebig33tuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 32,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hypothetical situation
You get 25mpg stock.
You swap tranny bits to get 30 mpg (unlikely)

Assuming gas prices are $2.50/gallon. After 25,000 miles, you'd save just over $400. That'd barely cover the cost of the Ap2 tranny, much less the effort you'd put into it.

This whole discussion has been beaten to death. If you do that much highway driving and care *that much* about gas mileage, get a beater car.
Old 11-18-2009, 06:01 AM
  #40  
Registered User

 
takeshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spectacle,Nov 17 2009, 11:47 AM
Want to see how much better your gas mileage will be if you cruised 6th gear at 2k RPM? Get on the hwy and try it.
I'd second this if you really want to see if lower RPM's help. I'm sure there's a point of diminishing returns though I don't know exactly where that would be. This approach also seems much more reasonable then going through a gear or transmission swap just to find out.

Originally Posted by moogleii,Nov 17 2009, 02:20 PM
And yaeh, cutting your cruise speed would help greatly. I cruise at 80-85, and my mileage is about 20-21 (well, with mixed driving, I have no huge commutes).
Using cruise control helps a lot too.

Originally Posted by bluAP1s2k,Nov 17 2009, 07:51 PM
It sounds to me, and I could be wrong, that he sees the car as inefficient simply because of the gas mileage. This is just not the type of efficiency honda had in mind when designing the S. They were focused on efficiency in terms of power output for a NA 2.0 L or 2.2L 4 cylinder engine.
My thought exactly. Compare the S to other comparable cars and it is definitely one of the more fuel efficient options.


Quick Reply: Are RPMs Why Our Cars Are Inefficient?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 AM.