Results after Comptech Super.
#21
I think you might be comparing apples and oranges here. Not sure which turbo kits you are referring to but most of the kits come with at least an E-manage or require a proper tuning solution. Set up an SC with equivalent tuning and you won't see much in the way of peak difference.
The place where a turbo out performs the S2000 SC kits is the mid range. A well set up turbo can reach usuable boost in the mid range whereas the SCs won't. This leads me to your point about power out of a corner. With the S2000 SC kits unless you enter the corner in a low gear and high revs you won't have instant power out of the corner as you'll be out of boost range.
So if your point is that turbo has an advantage over SC then you are correct, but for all the wrong reasons.
The place where a turbo out performs the S2000 SC kits is the mid range. A well set up turbo can reach usuable boost in the mid range whereas the SCs won't. This leads me to your point about power out of a corner. With the S2000 SC kits unless you enter the corner in a low gear and high revs you won't have instant power out of the corner as you'll be out of boost range.
So if your point is that turbo has an advantage over SC then you are correct, but for all the wrong reasons.
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: holbrook
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Drive the car and find another car that would normally give the S2k good run like an SRT 4. Then slam the doors on him. There's very few daily driven cars that will keep up with your car if it's set up properly. The SC will not give you low end power. But once you're moving you'll catch most daily driven cars on the road.
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Then the SRT-4 spends well UNDER $200 and blows the doors off your $5,500+ MODIFIED S2000.
And the SRT-4 will drive entirely like stock without problems like...oh I dunno...a clutch slipping to sh*t.
And the SRT-4 will drive entirely like stock without problems like...oh I dunno...a clutch slipping to sh*t.
#25
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the replies!! Well, I just wanna clear up some misunderstandings. The supercharged Honda S2000 isn't mines, it is my cousin's car. I guess we just need to race another car and find out how fast it is....
My cousin and I both own a Honda S2000... mines is a 03 NFR Stock S2k. His is the 01 Silver Comptech Supercharged with aftercooler S2k. Well, maybe this weekend we will be able to get it dynoed. I will try and see if I can race him to see the differences. Again thanks for all the replies and concern/advice you guys are giving me.
-Alan
My cousin and I both own a Honda S2000... mines is a 03 NFR Stock S2k. His is the 01 Silver Comptech Supercharged with aftercooler S2k. Well, maybe this weekend we will be able to get it dynoed. I will try and see if I can race him to see the differences. Again thanks for all the replies and concern/advice you guys are giving me.
-Alan
#26
Registered User
My Vortech was installed this summer and I think it really is significantly faster. I didn't think so at first but it is really fast 6-9, 7-9 especially. But what I liked the most was 4-6 where there was slightly more than stock which made the car feel faster overall. Now, the reason why i say it is much faster is because of 2 reasons. 1, my belt fell off and im stock again and it is slow as hell compared to before, sucks driving it. 2, I think the rush from 7-9 is really awesome, scary even. At night when its cool, it pulls hard and relentless.
Check your belt tension
Dyno it
Then re-assess your opnion of the kit.
Check your belt tension
Dyno it
Then re-assess your opnion of the kit.
#27
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anthonymv,Sep 7 2004, 11:32 PM
My Vortech was installed this summer and I think it really is significantly faster. I didn't think so at first but it is really fast 6-9, 7-9 especially. But what I liked the most was 4-6 where there was slightly more than stock which made the car feel faster overall. Now, the reason why i say it is much faster is because of 2 reasons. 1, my belt fell off and im stock again and it is slow as hell compared to before, sucks driving it. 2, I think the rush from 7-9 is really awesome, scary even. At night when its cool, it pulls hard and relentless.
Check your belt tension
Dyno it
Then re-assess your opnion of the kit.
Check your belt tension
Dyno it
Then re-assess your opnion of the kit.
-Alan
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Roanoke
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AusS2000,Sep 7 2004, 07:39 PM
I think you might be comparing apples and oranges here. Not sure which turbo kits you are referring to but most of the kits come with at least an E-manage or require a proper tuning solution. Set up an SC with equivalent tuning and you won't see much in the way of peak difference.
The place where a turbo out performs the S2000 SC kits is the mid range. A well set up turbo can reach usuable boost in the mid range whereas the SCs won't. This leads me to your point about power out of a corner. With the S2000 SC kits unless you enter the corner in a low gear and high revs you won't have instant power out of the corner as you'll be out of boost range.
So if your point is that turbo has an advantage over SC then you are correct, but for all the wrong reasons.
The place where a turbo out performs the S2000 SC kits is the mid range. A well set up turbo can reach usuable boost in the mid range whereas the SCs won't. This leads me to your point about power out of a corner. With the S2000 SC kits unless you enter the corner in a low gear and high revs you won't have instant power out of the corner as you'll be out of boost range.
So if your point is that turbo has an advantage over SC then you are correct, but for all the wrong reasons.