S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Rear Knuckle, Hub and Bearing Removal/Replacement

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-25-2004, 06:53 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Hustn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Conifer, CO
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Excellent writeup Nobody.
Old 07-25-2004, 08:18 PM
  #12  
Administrator


 
Ludedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vegas Baby, Vegas
Posts: 15,835
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Jul 25 2004, 07:46 PM
Not to take this awesome write-up off track, but I think 90 may be too high for our lugs. Something on the order of 75 ft-lb. Anyway, best wishes.
Spec is 80 lb//ft. I usually tighten them to between 80-90 myself.
Old 07-25-2004, 08:20 PM
  #13  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Nobody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

79.6 ft/lbs is what the manual recommends, but if I can quote Xviper: "I feel 80 is not quite enough and although 100 may still be safe, I compromise at 90. There have been reports of the odd owner here where the lugnuts loosened at 80."

Also: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...;Lug+Nuts"

90 is pretty much standard at the track whether it's Volvos or Ferraris. I've no idea why the first one went. It's possible that it was overtorqued past 90....I'd rather I made a mistake than there be some defect with Honda Lugs.

And yes, they're always tightened in a star pattern.

I'll link this thread--thanks Xviper!
Old 07-25-2004, 10:56 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Asura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

D,
As always, great write up
Old 07-26-2004, 03:29 AM
  #15  
Registered User

 
CoralDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Davie, FL
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Excellent write-up, well worth adding to the FAQ.

[QUOTE=Nobody,Jul 25 2004, 11:20 PM] I've no idea why the first one went.
Old 07-26-2004, 04:07 AM
  #16  
gsp
Registered User
 
gsp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks,

Great Job!
Old 07-26-2004, 07:02 AM
  #17  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

After stripping / breaking lug nuts on my 1st autocross car, I started using anti-seeze on all my lugs. I haven't had a problem since, and my wheels come off quite often. I also make sure I never tighten OR loosen hot lug nuts.

I had to replace both of my rear hubs AND bearings between 35K and 40K miles. I've also replaced one hub and bearing set on another S2K. I think we just have underengineered bearings on the rear, which wind up scoring the hub when they go out.
Old 07-26-2004, 12:05 PM
  #18  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Nobody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The seize theory does explain the first one going--it looked ok, but when I went to remove it it just cracked right off (with very little pressure). Does Anti-Seize compound screw up measuring the torque the way oil does?

Any particular brand you guys would recommend?
Old 07-26-2004, 12:27 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
RACER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 15,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CoralDoc,Jul 26 2004, 04:29 AM
One of the key lines of evidence for the "seizing hypothesis"is that many times the studs break upon lug nut REMOVAL.

My advice is to use a VERY LIGHT coating of anti-seize on lug nuts, brake caliper bolts, and any other fastener that is regularly removed and replaced on the car, especially those exposed to high heat.


I had this problem once 5 years ago on a 86 CRX. I tracked it twice, and when I tried removing one of the lug nuts, the lug broke. It was as if the nut was fused to the lug.

I now put a little bit of antiseize on the lugs. It does not take a whole lot, as the nut spins around the lug, the antiseize is distributed very well inside the threads, there will be a very thin layer. I am talking a very tiny dab. If you put to much, you will get a thick layer of antiseize in the grooves and then the excess will fling off from centrifigal force as the wheel spins.

Remember, just a very thin film will do. I torque my wheels to about 75-80 ft lbs for track or hard spirited driving. I check the torque frequently and never had a problem.
Old 07-26-2004, 01:06 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
mikegarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Covington WA, USA
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The broken studs more likely point to under-torquing than over-torquing. Over-torquing will put stress into the bolt and stretch the threads. But under-torquing will allow the stud to flex, which will rapidly increase the number of fatigue cycles until they break.

Either problem requires replaceing the studs, but it is under-torquing that leads to the more dangerous failure.


Quick Reply: Rear Knuckle, Hub and Bearing Removal/Replacement



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:11 PM.