Process, Parts list, Prices, and general HOW TO upgrade from generic turbo kit to EMS
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Waterford
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jenner
They should make you 380 if that's what you want. But why go from 360 to 380? Even 440 is pretty pointless for most situations.
It is much easier to tune out fuel(ie running with larger injectors) than add fuel with high fuel pressure bandaids like FMUs.
They should make you 380 if that's what you want. But why go from 360 to 380? Even 440 is pretty pointless for most situations.
It is much easier to tune out fuel(ie running with larger injectors) than add fuel with high fuel pressure bandaids like FMUs.
I have no idea what the Comptech FMU has as a base fuel pressure. If it is 60 PSI when seeing no boost, then they would flow 440. I haven't heard of anybody that could tune out enough fuel at idle with 440s to make the car idle properly. It may be possible if you set the narrow throttle settings low enough and pull out a ton of fuel, but I am looking for a simpler installation/tune.
I am looking for an injector that is slightly larger than stock so I don't need to run as much fuel pressure. And, before anybody gets into a rant about AEM/larger injectors versus V-AFC and FMU, I am not changing to an AEM and big injectors for a motor running 7 PSI. There is no need for the investment in time or money. The car runs great and is tuned very well. My only goal is to reduce the amount of fuel pressure necessary to make it run as well as it does now.
-YS
#22
I'm running stock fuel pressure with my 755cc injectors and the AEM EMS is pulling out fuel at idle and non boost settings and adding fuel under boost. Works great.
I don't have an answer/solution for you for larger injectors + idle. e-manage or AEM EMS are the only paths to do that that I know of, and I don't reccommend the e-manage at all.
What will your goal of reducing the fuel pressure do for the system? If it runs great and is tuned well, why do you want to change it?
I don't have an answer/solution for you for larger injectors + idle. e-manage or AEM EMS are the only paths to do that that I know of, and I don't reccommend the e-manage at all.
What will your goal of reducing the fuel pressure do for the system? If it runs great and is tuned well, why do you want to change it?
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Waterford
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jenner
[B]I'm running stock fuel pressure with my 755cc injectors and the AEM EMS is pulling out fuel at idle and non boost settings and adding fuel under boost. Works great.
[B]I'm running stock fuel pressure with my 755cc injectors and the AEM EMS is pulling out fuel at idle and non boost settings and adding fuel under boost. Works great.
#24
The way I see it(in my limited knowledge) is that you need to increase the injector size as you lower the fuel pressure, in order to have the same amount of fuel at a given rpm/boost.
By increasing the injector size, any area that isn't in boost, or idle for example will need to have fuel pulled out. This works with a VAFC down to idle, but idle is too rich and you have no way to tune it.
So you are stuck. Can't reduce the fuel pressure without bigger injectors, can't idle with bigger injectors without fuel management computer.
By increasing the injector size, any area that isn't in boost, or idle for example will need to have fuel pulled out. This works with a VAFC down to idle, but idle is too rich and you have no way to tune it.
So you are stuck. Can't reduce the fuel pressure without bigger injectors, can't idle with bigger injectors without fuel management computer.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Waterford
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jenner
[B]The way I see it(in my limited knowledge) is that you need to increase the injector size as you lower the fuel pressure, in order to have the same amount of fuel at a given rpm/boost.
[B]The way I see it(in my limited knowledge) is that you need to increase the injector size as you lower the fuel pressure, in order to have the same amount of fuel at a given rpm/boost.
#26
There's no way to reduce fuel without a standalone ECU or a custom electronics box that reads the fuel PWM signal from stock ECU and provides a clone+ajustment based on the VAFC input. Even then, you'll have a slight delay as it is impossible to have it real time.
#28
For those of you following this thread, I thought I'd post a recent exchange with ChrisD that might be of use to you:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cbender wrote on 06-07-03 12:33PM:
Is it worth buying the AEM EGT sensors (one per cylinder) to give the AEM the ability to read individual cylinder exhaust temperatures or can I simply rely on my EGT gauge (mounted in the downpipe) to monitor my exhaust temperatures for all cylinders combined?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ChrisD replied on 06-07-03 12:35PM:
Personally I think that individual EGT sensors per cylinder are overkill for what you are planning on doing. I even think they might be overkill for what I'm doing. If you have one EGT gauge as it is, I doubt you'll need 4 more. Chris
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cbender wrote on 06-07-03 12:33PM:
Is it worth buying the AEM EGT sensors (one per cylinder) to give the AEM the ability to read individual cylinder exhaust temperatures or can I simply rely on my EGT gauge (mounted in the downpipe) to monitor my exhaust temperatures for all cylinders combined?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ChrisD replied on 06-07-03 12:35PM:
Personally I think that individual EGT sensors per cylinder are overkill for what you are planning on doing. I even think they might be overkill for what I'm doing. If you have one EGT gauge as it is, I doubt you'll need 4 more. Chris
#29
Here's another question, ChrisD:
If I'm only planning to run relatively low levels of boost (certainly no more than 8-9 psi on race gas, MAX), can I use the stock map sensor instead of buying a 3 bar one and avoid having to buy the following:
GM 3 Bar map sensor + pigtail: $10 bucks?
GM boost solenoid: $15 bucks
GM boost solenoid pigtal: $5 bucks
Thanks,
CB
If I'm only planning to run relatively low levels of boost (certainly no more than 8-9 psi on race gas, MAX), can I use the stock map sensor instead of buying a 3 bar one and avoid having to buy the following:
GM 3 Bar map sensor + pigtail: $10 bucks?
GM boost solenoid: $15 bucks
GM boost solenoid pigtal: $5 bucks
Thanks,
CB
#30
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by cbender
[B]Here's another question, ChrisD:
If I'm only planning to run relatively low levels of boost (certainly no more than 8-9 psi on race gas, MAX), can I use the stock map sensor instead of buying a 3 bar one and avoid having to buy the following:
GM 3 Bar map sensor + pigtail: $10 bucks?
[B]Here's another question, ChrisD:
If I'm only planning to run relatively low levels of boost (certainly no more than 8-9 psi on race gas, MAX), can I use the stock map sensor instead of buying a 3 bar one and avoid having to buy the following:
GM 3 Bar map sensor + pigtail: $10 bucks?