New Vortech supercharged dyno sheet posted....
#21
Originally posted by Rasputin314
Why not? You have a controlled reference (stock dyno w/reasonable shape) on a linear scale.
Why not? You have a controlled reference (stock dyno w/reasonable shape) on a linear scale.
[B]To subtract numbers like 20 or 30 hp, or even apply some universal percentage, is naive.
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Austin
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by infinitebass
Could you have answered your question more clearly?
Why would you trust a dyno thats appears so shoddy. Did you trust the Toda dyno for the cams? Did the actual real life dyno appear ANYTHING like it? No. If a company such as Vortech releases a dyno that looks like it was copied by a 3 year old with a crayon
Could you have answered your question more clearly?
Why would you trust a dyno thats appears so shoddy. Did you trust the Toda dyno for the cams? Did the actual real life dyno appear ANYTHING like it? No. If a company such as Vortech releases a dyno that looks like it was copied by a 3 year old with a crayon
In this specific case, you can say an exact % increase is required, because it is a linear scale, and you have a common reference.
The numbers and curves are not doctored. It is not a random scale. It is a scale from a loading dyno that people don't understand.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just took the percentage increase at every 500 RPM's from base to SC'ed and applied it to my own Base dyno.
Example at 7000 RPM they saw a 32% increase in HP so I applied that same 32% to my Dyno and came up with X HP increase.
Some one tell me if this wont work so I dont waste time doing the torque Numbers.
I will post the spreadsheet if anybody is interested.
Example at 7000 RPM they saw a 32% increase in HP so I applied that same 32% to my Dyno and came up with X HP increase.
Some one tell me if this wont work so I dont waste time doing the torque Numbers.
I will post the spreadsheet if anybody is interested.
#29
[QUOTE]Originally posted by infinitebass
[B]
I agree it would make sense, and that would be awesome, but like I was saying, the fact that such a large and reputable company would even use such a dyno just reeks of stupidity (From a marketing standpoint).
[B]
I agree it would make sense, and that would be awesome, but like I was saying, the fact that such a large and reputable company would even use such a dyno just reeks of stupidity (From a marketing standpoint).
#30
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to agree while the dyno is harder to apply to the #'s we are used to using the info needed is still there. The percent increase is all that is really important. This dyno is more than enough to put me at ease with my purchase. Now if the things would ship I would be a happy camper.