NA vs. Boost
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maximum N/A power is not the most daily drivable car by far and in many ways takes away from a lot of the joys of the car while you do gain others if you take your car to a road course constantly.
BTW, I think the toda head parts for this car doesn't add anything at all that can be considered useful or worth the money. Hey, at least you get a license plate frame that says "Toda Power" though.
BTW, I think the toda head parts for this car doesn't add anything at all that can be considered useful or worth the money. Hey, at least you get a license plate frame that says "Toda Power" though.
#13
[QUOTE]Originally posted by -S2K-2K-
I think the only way 300 rwhp from a N/A S2000 would be to order Inline Pro's 2.5 liter kit. (they estimate it at 260 hp) Then going with ITB's and all of your bolt ons. (Header, Exhaust, etc) And then pray for 300 hp. There is a thread somewhere around here where someone is in the process of doing the 2.5 liter kit from Inline pro. Find it and maybe watch his progress?
I think the only way 300 rwhp from a N/A S2000 would be to order Inline Pro's 2.5 liter kit. (they estimate it at 260 hp) Then going with ITB's and all of your bolt ons. (Header, Exhaust, etc) And then pray for 300 hp. There is a thread somewhere around here where someone is in the process of doing the 2.5 liter kit from Inline pro. Find it and maybe watch his progress?
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NOVA/Rye,NY/Tempe AZ
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by yellafeva
If going to high hp, a lot of "beefing up" will be necessary to the internal parts, as well as tranny and diff.
If going to high hp, a lot of "beefing up" will be necessary to the internal parts, as well as tranny and diff.
Originally posted by mikecl713
the car meant for high n/a power but boost can be done safely.... if u have money i'd just go with all toda parts and tuning...
the car meant for high n/a power but boost can be done safely.... if u have money i'd just go with all toda parts and tuning...
advanracing62 - I would take a deep look into your wallet before you go NA, if you want 300-350whp i would go with inline pros stage 1 turbo kit youll make 320whp ive been in a car wiht this kit and his car was FAST plus you will smoke anyone with a supercharger unless the have considderablely more mods then header exhuast and supercharger. If you look at a dynograph with a supercharger and the inlinepro kit the usable power in the low to mid range area is much more teh supercharger lacks in the mid range. also the turbo kit is cheaper then the supercharger.
#15
Low to moderate boost turbo kit will give you the best overall gains for the $ on the S2000 (over the entire RPM range). Cheapest bolt on is your run of the mill SC (good peak, no benefit down low). All engine cost big $ but you stay lighter. Probably will never see a streetable S2000 with much over 260 WHP - all engine.
To do the turbo right, you really should build the motor from the ground up. Pistons (lower comp), connecting rods and head work (with cams) are really a must. Fuel system (including stand alone), increased cooling (esp oil), all adds up the $ factor, but think of it as money in the bank and more time on the road and less time looking for parts to replace the one's you've destroyed - saving money up front. HP cost money - relaiable HP cost lots of money - period.
To do the turbo right, you really should build the motor from the ground up. Pistons (lower comp), connecting rods and head work (with cams) are really a must. Fuel system (including stand alone), increased cooling (esp oil), all adds up the $ factor, but think of it as money in the bank and more time on the road and less time looking for parts to replace the one's you've destroyed - saving money up front. HP cost money - relaiable HP cost lots of money - period.
#17
With the popularity of turbocharging this engine increasing, there will be turbo cams developed for the S2000. The timing curve for a turbo motor is and should be different. One of the reasons I've not explored turbo charging yet is there's not a totally complete solution for turbocharging as of yet. There are a lot of companies offering pieces of the pie, but those pieces were not developed together, and may not work as well as a kit developed as a whole. There are some fairly complete kits, but not as complete at they should be.
I love turbocharging and owned a Turbo RX-7 a few years ago. Owning that car taught me the lesson involving bolting on parts vs building a purpose built and complete set-up. The former will actually cost you more time and $ in the long run.
I love turbocharging and owned a Turbo RX-7 a few years ago. Owning that car taught me the lesson involving bolting on parts vs building a purpose built and complete set-up. The former will actually cost you more time and $ in the long run.