Mobil 1 5w-30 EP
#21
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 124Spider,Aug 11 2008, 06:54 PM
As to "bikes" working at higher RPMs than our engine, on 5W-30, that's absolutely, completely irrelevant to whether you should be running 5W-30 in our cars. Honda made this engine to run on 10W-30; unless you've rebuilt the engine, and you're a stud engine builder, it's just silly, IMO, to mess with thinner oils in this engine.
#22
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/dir...w/.efc6d19/967
http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/showthread....astpost&t=59740
according to that link, 5w-30 is factory recommended for the Si
it's likely 10w-30 is "grandfathered" into the manual for the S
http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/showthread....astpost&t=59740
according to that link, 5w-30 is factory recommended for the Si
it's likely 10w-30 is "grandfathered" into the manual for the S
#23
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, so you think that Honda just mindlessly specified 10W-30 for this engine, when 5W-30 would be better (apparently, because "bikes" and BMWs use 5W-30)?
Go for it....
ps--Mazda says to use dino oil in my RX-8; I do. It has never been "proven" that synthetics are better, and dino does just fine; modern dino oil is so good, I have no concerns that synthetic would be better when the manufacturer specifies dino oil. My Miata is specified to use 5W-30; the engine builder says to use 10W-30; I use 10W-30, cuz he builds great engines, and I believe that he knows what he's talking about when he's taken the engine apart and put it back together.
But if using 5W-30 with your AP2 somehow gives you a feeling that you know more than Honda about our engine, good for you.
Go for it....
ps--Mazda says to use dino oil in my RX-8; I do. It has never been "proven" that synthetics are better, and dino does just fine; modern dino oil is so good, I have no concerns that synthetic would be better when the manufacturer specifies dino oil. My Miata is specified to use 5W-30; the engine builder says to use 10W-30; I use 10W-30, cuz he builds great engines, and I believe that he knows what he's talking about when he's taken the engine apart and put it back together.
But if using 5W-30 with your AP2 somehow gives you a feeling that you know more than Honda about our engine, good for you.
#24
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 124Spider,Aug 11 2008, 09:03 PM
Ok, so you think that Honda just mindlessly specified 10W-30 for this engine, when 5W-30 would be better (apparently, because "bikes" and BMWs use 5W-30)?
Go for it....
Go for it....
I've run synthetic in my FD RX-7 for over 10 years, so have plenty of other people...it looks fine at tear-down...I do not think it's good to run synthetic in the oil metering pump because 4 stroke oils aren't designed to burn and can leave deposits, I run Idemitsu rotary pre-mix
#25
There's more to the oil than the rating stamped on the bottle. There's a lot of cross over in viscocity on the market. Redline's 5W40 almost looks exactly the same as their 10W40 on paper and there are a number of 10W30s that look nothing more than repackaged 5W30s. It's important to look at the manufacturer's specs for the specific oil you're looking to use. I personally use a 5W30 in colder environments because it flows faster at startup. There are those on the site that use 0W30 for the same reason. However, I now live in Florida and will stick with 10W30 year round due to the fact there is a notable difference in Amsoil's 5W30 and 10W30.
FTR - I used Amsoil 10W40 in my 10th Anniversary RX-7. I also ran a small amount of one of their 2 cycle oils in the gas. That's how I got introduced to Amsoil - I used to buy it through Mazdatrix. The car suffered a thrown apex seal due to detonation - the turbo manifold to turbo gasket had a tiny upward facing leak that acted like a blow torch and super heated the intake - and blam! I was then running on 4 chambers instead of 6. I was in college and ran the car like that for 3 more months. Eventually sold the car with the spare motor and I helped the buyer tear down the engine. The housings were prestine - not a single mark from the damaged ampex seal, which is almost unheard of following an apex seal failure. He put a new seal kit on the car and it ran like new. That's why I still use Amsoil - and why the guy who bought my RX-7 uses it too. He'd never seen such a perfectly clean motor after chucking an apex seal.
FTR - I used Amsoil 10W40 in my 10th Anniversary RX-7. I also ran a small amount of one of their 2 cycle oils in the gas. That's how I got introduced to Amsoil - I used to buy it through Mazdatrix. The car suffered a thrown apex seal due to detonation - the turbo manifold to turbo gasket had a tiny upward facing leak that acted like a blow torch and super heated the intake - and blam! I was then running on 4 chambers instead of 6. I was in college and ran the car like that for 3 more months. Eventually sold the car with the spare motor and I helped the buyer tear down the engine. The housings were prestine - not a single mark from the damaged ampex seal, which is almost unheard of following an apex seal failure. He put a new seal kit on the car and it ran like new. That's why I still use Amsoil - and why the guy who bought my RX-7 uses it too. He'd never seen such a perfectly clean motor after chucking an apex seal.
#26
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I run Mobil 1 15w-50 EP in my FD RX-7, which routinely sees 15 psi boost, primarily because of the ungodly fuel dilution...but as you said, the engine looked pristine at the last tear down
#27
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#28
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
too bad these guys don't run a comparison test, huh?
http://www.asmeconferences.org/IJTC07/pdfs/Sample.pdf
http://www.asmeconferences.org/IJTC07/pdfs/Sample.pdf
#29
Originally Posted by 124Spider,Aug 11 2008, 09:54 PM
It may be that 5W-30 won't harm your engine. But I can't begin to understand why you'd even bother using it, when Honda specifies 10W-30, which works just fine. Unless you're a world driving champion, the noise in your lap times is greater than the benefit you'll see in power from running a thinner oil, so why play games with your engine?
As to "bikes" working at higher RPMs than our engine, on 5W-30, that's absolutely, completely irrelevant to whether you should be running 5W-30 in our cars. Honda made this engine to run on 10W-30; unless you've rebuilt the engine, and you're a stud engine builder, it's just silly, IMO, to mess with thinner oils in this engine.
As to "bikes" working at higher RPMs than our engine, on 5W-30, that's absolutely, completely irrelevant to whether you should be running 5W-30 in our cars. Honda made this engine to run on 10W-30; unless you've rebuilt the engine, and you're a stud engine builder, it's just silly, IMO, to mess with thinner oils in this engine.
#30
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay2000,Aug 12 2008, 01:32 PM
WOW, I must be a complete idiot than, I run Amsoil series 2000 , 0-30 weight because it performs better than the 10-30 by amsoil.
Originally Posted by Jay2000,Aug 12 2008, 01:32 PM
If I am not mistaken the 0,5,10,etc is the flow rate(how fast it gets through the engine at start up or something like that) and the 30 is the weight at temperature. It is all a matter of opinion and what you like and think is best for you.