S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

MAP sensor problem showing up at 35k miles? Plus some interesting data

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-11-2003, 09:08 AM
  #11  
Community Organizer
Community Organizer
 
Pinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 8,578
Received 104 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Excuse me but who started this thead? Is it the infamous UL himself? My god he can diagnose a car having burned up a roller bearing by a half assed explination by Joe Schmoe with no mechanical background. Though on his car he isn't sure!

What's this world coming to.

I bet you it was your MAP sensor. 65K and never had that big of an issue but in times where it doesn't run right or temps are changing I give a whack or 2 on it. Keeps things "loose".

To quote Space Cowboys: "This is how we fix on Russian space station" As he whacks away at some valve!
Old 03-11-2003, 09:13 AM
  #12  
Administrator


 
krazik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Posts: 17,004
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

so would one need 2 catch cans then? Some how I assumed the oil came thru both lines.
Old 03-11-2003, 10:21 AM
  #13  
Moderator
Moderator
 
Luder94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Box suburb, IL
Posts: 12,889
Received 70 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Pinky
[B]Excuse me but who started this thead?
Old 03-11-2003, 10:32 AM
  #14  

 
xviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

What does "whacking" the MAP sensor actually do? Does it knock off some contaminant? Does it make the wiring connection better? Is there a mechanical reason why this works?
Also, UL, has anyone (you maybe) looked into finding another MAP sensor that is less susceptable to this sort of decay in performance over time?
Old 03-11-2003, 10:49 AM
  #15  
Community Organizer
Community Organizer
 
Pinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 8,578
Received 104 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Luder94


Wasn't that also a quote on Armegeddon?
One of those THE WORLD IS GONNA BLOW UP movies.
Old 03-11-2003, 10:52 AM
  #16  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Which Iridium plugs you are using? Denso IK24?
Old 03-11-2003, 11:30 AM
  #17  

 
cdelena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 9,210
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by xviper
[B]What does "whacking" the MAP sensor actually do?
Old 03-11-2003, 01:30 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Penforhire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: La Habra
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

"Whacking" is an age-old technique applied to repair aged contacting potentiometers (the guts of most position sensors, like our TPS). Another method is repeated rapid end-to-end motion of the wiper.

I don't know squat about our MAP sensor design but whacking does a few things (I do help design sensors). It shakes loose debris off the moving contacts and possibly out of the wear track. It can also redistribute bearing debris thereby making the motion smoother. It can clear the oxides or fretting corrosion off any pressure contacts (non-soldered electrical connections).

It can also reset the radial and angular position of the contacts (one of the best benefits). Some sensors allow you to manually reposition the resting angles (ends of travel and/or a midpoint)

That is a big deal for contacting sensors that live much of their life at a few positions (e.g. TPS at idle and WOT). Normal engine vibration causes contacts to 'drill' into the surface ("dither" is the industry term). A contact tracking difference measured in microns can make a night-and-day difference in sensor performance.

There are plenty of non-contacting sensor designs but they tend to be more expensive and can have other issues (drift, sensitivity to electric fields, etc.). Our electric power steering (EPS) torque sensor is a non-contacting design (inductive I believe) but I expect the helical sleeve that drives it will wear eventually.
Old 03-11-2003, 01:36 PM
  #19  
Registered User

 
Tedster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A whack a day keeps the doctor away.
Old 03-11-2003, 01:41 PM
  #20  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Tedster
A whack a day keeps the doctor away.
Wouldn't unprovoked beatings of the MAP sensor eventually cause it to break? I get stutters every now and then, but I have been waiting to whack it until it gets worse. It seems to me that whacking it may just be a short term fix that would have "side effects".


Quick Reply: MAP sensor problem showing up at 35k miles? Plus some interesting data



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 PM.