S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Low Dyno Result?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-08-2001, 12:28 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KIDS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Auckland
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi all, i just dyno my s2000 for the first time on saturday. Max Power recorded was 125.3kW@8417RPM. a 30% decrease from honda's claimed crank 177kW. Is this normal? I was kinda expecting 140kW at the wheels.
Other Conditions:
Was a very Hot Day
Had a Fan to simulate cool air entering engine
RON98 Fuel (98 octane rating)
10,007km mileage.
Any comments would be greatful. cheers!
Old 04-08-2001, 06:35 AM
  #2  

 
Utah S2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ogden
Posts: 4,307
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

http://www.s2000online.com/forums/showthre...?threadid=10774
Old 04-08-2001, 07:57 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
ultimate lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: You wish
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Kid,

What kind of dynomometer did you use? Different chassis dynos read differently. They are best used to compare differences before and after, not to assess absolute power accurately.

UL
Old 04-08-2001, 12:30 PM
  #4  

 
cdelena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 9,210
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

That is an unusually low reading.. normally you would expect 140-150 KW. You have to calculate 15-20% in drive train losses so your expectation was in line. There is enough difference in dynos and operation that a 5% variation is not unusual, but the 30% that you are seeing makes that test suspect.
Old 04-08-2001, 01:17 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KIDS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Auckland
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well on the sheet on paper its said:
"Torque and Power corrected in accordance with ISO1585"

but here is the weird part:
Peak Torque: 394.5NM@6633RPM

Very weird
Old 04-08-2001, 05:34 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
ultimate lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: You wish
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Definitely something wrong here, as that equates to nearly 300 lbs-ft of torque. That's twice the crank torque of the S2K engine, yet it is noticeably less than the actual wheel torque in any gear (Corrected wheel torque is usually around 130 lbs-ft or 175 Nm). Even 6th gear should show about 600 Nm or so at that rpm at the wheels (actual).

If your engien really was producing 300 lbs-ft at 6600 rpm, your corrected hp should have been int eh vicinity of 375 hp, or 280 kW.

Strange.

UL
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
6262
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
3
08-29-2013 12:49 PM
S2000 Cabrio
S2000 Forced Induction
1
08-03-2005 10:42 AM
Chiung
S2000 Under The Hood
10
07-13-2004 03:49 AM
mikecl713
S2000 Talk
10
07-29-2003 07:10 PM
cjb80
S2000 Under The Hood
30
01-03-2003 06:52 PM



Quick Reply: Low Dyno Result?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:36 PM.