S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Laskey Racing Engines Poor Performer

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-24-2014, 05:25 AM
  #31  

 
JUSTINTHECOASTIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St.Petersburg/Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,806
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Billman250
Anything over 8400 is really pushing it.

Lower VTEC to 5400, and you have a nice usable 3k rpm powerband just like the Ap1.
I've lowered vtec to 5.4k and still rev to 8.6-8.8k. At the time, it's mainly street driven and when I do go to the track I lower it to 8.5-8.6k
Old 11-24-2014, 07:12 AM
  #32  

 
Slowcrash_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,373
Received 487 Likes on 398 Posts
Default

Have you dyno'ed your car? I can essentially guarantee you're not making much power there. Obviously it's your car and you have every right to drive it as you wish, just saying revving an F22 that high isn't productive.

[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JNnzqwTUMI[/media] probably been seen to death but it highlights why f22 has a lower rev limit. The technical jibber jabber starts at 2:35'ish
Old 11-24-2014, 07:32 AM
  #33  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
yamahaSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenwood, AR
Posts: 3,214
Received 142 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slowcrash_101
It's possible but not advised, at 8400 rpm the f22 pistons have the same speed as f20 at 9,000. So you're pumping the same amount of air, because the bores haven't changed, only the stroke. In fact doing a little math at 9,000 rpm on the f22 crank and pistons, would be the equivalent of 9,670'ish rpm on an f20. The head stopped making power about 800 rpm ago.

Old 11-24-2014, 07:42 AM
  #34  

 
JUSTINTHECOASTIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St.Petersburg/Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,806
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slowcrash_101
Have you dyno'ed your car? I can essentially guarantee you're not making much power there. Obviously it's your car and you have every right to drive it as you wish, just saying revving an F22 that high isn't productive.

[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JNnzqwTUMI[/media] probably been seen to death but it highlights why f22 has a lower rev limit. The technical jibber jabber starts at 2:35'ish
If this response was directed to me, yes I have dyno'd my car, check my thread, and many times after that. Reason why I like a higher rev limit is so that I'm higher in my powerband for the next 'up shift'. If you look at those dynos you are referring to, you should note that although power may not increase, power also doesn't dramatically drop of either.
Old 11-24-2014, 08:56 AM
  #35  

 
Slowcrash_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,373
Received 487 Likes on 398 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yamahaSHO
Originally Posted by Slowcrash_101' timestamp='1416738566' post='23415088
It's possible but not advised, at 8400 rpm the f22 pistons have the same speed as f20 at 9,000. So you're pumping the same amount of air, because the bores haven't changed, only the stroke. In fact doing a little math at 9,000 rpm on the f22 crank and pistons, would be the equivalent of 9,670'ish rpm on an f20. The head stopped making power about 800 rpm ago.

That's what the pistons do right? In conjunction with the valves, the pistons suck air, compress it, expand it(when mixed with a fuel and ignited), and pump it out. So for a given piston speed and travel, said piston will move a certain quantity of air provided the cylinder head ports and valves can provide said quantity. Is my understanding off base? If you exceed the capacity of the head and valves to supply air to the cylinders the car won't make more power, is this not correct?

So given the stroke is longer on the f22 than on an f20, the piston moves faster on the former, than the latter at a given rpm hence power drops off at a lower rpm on the f22 than on the f20 because the head and valves cannot supply enough air past a certain piston speed. Conversely more torque is made at lower rpms on an F22 vs F20 because of higher piston speed at lower rpms displacing more air in the F22 vs F20 because the flow potential of the head has not been exceeded.

If I'm wrong please correct me.
Old 11-24-2014, 09:03 AM
  #36  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
yamahaSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenwood, AR
Posts: 3,214
Received 142 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slowcrash_101
Originally Posted by yamahaSHO' timestamp='1416846746' post='23416290
[quote name='Slowcrash_101' timestamp='1416738566' post='23415088']
It's possible but not advised, at 8400 rpm the f22 pistons have the same speed as f20 at 9,000. So you're pumping the same amount of air, because the bores haven't changed, only the stroke. In fact doing a little math at 9,000 rpm on the f22 crank and pistons, would be the equivalent of 9,670'ish rpm on an f20. The head stopped making power about 800 rpm ago.

That's what the pistons do right? In conjunction with the valves, the pistons suck air, compress it, expand it(when mixed with a fuel and ignited), and pump it out. So for a given piston speed and travel, said piston will move a certain quantity of air provided the cylinder head ports and valves can provide said quantity. Is my understanding off base? If you exceed the capacity of the head and valves to supply air to the cylinders the car won't make more power, is this not correct?

So given the stroke is longer on the f22 than on an f20, the piston moves faster on the former, than the latter at a given rpm hence power drops off at a lower rpm on the f22 than on the f20 because the head and valves cannot supply enough air past a certain piston speed. Conversely more torque is made at lower rpms on an F22 vs F20 because of higher piston speed at lower rpms displacing more air in the F22 vs F20 because the flow potential of the head has not been exceeded.

If I'm wrong please correct me.
[/quote]

The stroke adds to the displacement.

The heads and valves are a completely different discussion.
Old 11-24-2014, 09:15 AM
  #37  

 
Slowcrash_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,373
Received 487 Likes on 398 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yamahaSHO
Originally Posted by Slowcrash_101' timestamp='1416851786' post='23416424
[quote name='yamahaSHO' timestamp='1416846746' post='23416290']
[quote name='Slowcrash_101' timestamp='1416738566' post='23415088']
It's possible but not advised, at 8400 rpm the f22 pistons have the same speed as f20 at 9,000. So you're pumping the same amount of air, because the bores haven't changed, only the stroke. In fact doing a little math at 9,000 rpm on the f22 crank and pistons, would be the equivalent of 9,670'ish rpm on an f20. The head stopped making power about 800 rpm ago.

That's what the pistons do right? In conjunction with the valves, the pistons suck air, compress it, expand it(when mixed with a fuel and ignited), and pump it out. So for a given piston speed and travel, said piston will move a certain quantity of air provided the cylinder head ports and valves can provide said quantity. Is my understanding off base? If you exceed the capacity of the head and valves to supply air to the cylinders the car won't make more power, is this not correct?

So given the stroke is longer on the f22 than on an f20, the piston moves faster on the former, than the latter at a given rpm hence power drops off at a lower rpm on the f22 than on the f20 because the head and valves cannot supply enough air past a certain piston speed. Conversely more torque is made at lower rpms on an F22 vs F20 because of higher piston speed at lower rpms displacing more air in the F22 vs F20 because the flow potential of the head has not been exceeded.

If I'm wrong please correct me.
[/quote]

The stroke adds to the displacement.

The heads and valves are a completely different discussion.
[/quote]

Longer stroke increases the volume of the cylinder this is true. It also increases piston speed for a given crank rpm, or is that wrong? As the length of a lever increases, it's motion ratio also increases. The combination of increased cylinder volume, and increased piston speed is what give you more pumping rates for a given rpm vs a shorter stroke. Or is this incorrect?
Old 11-24-2014, 09:22 AM
  #38  

 
Slowcrash_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,373
Received 487 Likes on 398 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JUSTINTHECOASTIE
Originally Posted by Slowcrash_101' timestamp='1416845527' post='23416253
Have you dyno'ed your car? I can essentially guarantee you're not making much power there. Obviously it's your car and you have every right to drive it as you wish, just saying revving an F22 that high isn't productive.

[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JNnzqwTUMI[/media] probably been seen to death but it highlights why f22 has a lower rev limit. The technical jibber jabber starts at 2:35'ish
If this response was directed to me, yes I have dyno'd my car, check my thread, and many times after that. Reason why I like a higher rev limit is so that I'm higher in my powerband for the next 'up shift'. If you look at those dynos you are referring to, you should note that although power may not increase, power also doesn't dramatically drop of either.
I stand corrected, and it makes sense, torque multiplication in a lower gear can essentially give you equal or higher acceleration compared to a taller gear even if the taller gear has a higher power output.
Old 11-24-2014, 10:04 AM
  #39  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
yamahaSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenwood, AR
Posts: 3,214
Received 142 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slowcrash_101
Originally Posted by yamahaSHO' timestamp='1416852235' post='23416429
[quote name='Slowcrash_101' timestamp='1416851786' post='23416424']
[quote name='yamahaSHO' timestamp='1416846746' post='23416290']
[quote name='Slowcrash_101' timestamp='1416738566' post='23415088']
It's possible but not advised, at 8400 rpm the f22 pistons have the same speed as f20 at 9,000. So you're pumping the same amount of air, because the bores haven't changed, only the stroke. In fact doing a little math at 9,000 rpm on the f22 crank and pistons, would be the equivalent of 9,670'ish rpm on an f20. The head stopped making power about 800 rpm ago.

That's what the pistons do right? In conjunction with the valves, the pistons suck air, compress it, expand it(when mixed with a fuel and ignited), and pump it out. So for a given piston speed and travel, said piston will move a certain quantity of air provided the cylinder head ports and valves can provide said quantity. Is my understanding off base? If you exceed the capacity of the head and valves to supply air to the cylinders the car won't make more power, is this not correct?

So given the stroke is longer on the f22 than on an f20, the piston moves faster on the former, than the latter at a given rpm hence power drops off at a lower rpm on the f22 than on the f20 because the head and valves cannot supply enough air past a certain piston speed. Conversely more torque is made at lower rpms on an F22 vs F20 because of higher piston speed at lower rpms displacing more air in the F22 vs F20 because the flow potential of the head has not been exceeded.

If I'm wrong please correct me.
[/quote]

The stroke adds to the displacement.

The heads and valves are a completely different discussion.
[/quote]

Longer stroke increases the volume of the cylinder this is true. It also increases piston speed for a given crank rpm, or is that wrong? As the length of a lever increases, it's motion ratio also increases. The combination of increased cylinder volume, and increased piston speed is what give you more pumping rates for a given rpm vs a shorter stroke. Or is this incorrect?
[/quote]

The longer stroke, by itself, is going to pump more air for a given revolution (and the intake tract will see this). Yes, you'll gain more speed for the same rotation as there is more distance to travel in that revolution, but the fact is you will still be filling more space. Whether or not intake path allows or makes use of it all is another subject.

For the most part, you're looking at piston speed from a safety standpoint... Wither it be more wear, overheating, overall vibration from running the motor higher, etc.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
willrask
S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum
28
09-25-2015 09:58 PM
s.hasan546
S2000 Forced Induction
31
03-27-2008 05:35 AM
wadswoaj
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
13
06-03-2004 11:47 AM



Quick Reply: Laskey Racing Engines Poor Performer



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:20 PM.