S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Interesting read on air filters

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-07-2007, 12:02 PM
  #11  

 
slipstream444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

The first test of the "data" in this comparison is to determine its validity. Two of the filters listed against the AC Delco brand have been out of production for a while, and two others have been superseded. As for the K/N: I will never support a wet gauze filter - it's a bad idea for everyday street use.

I looked up the filter listed under the Amsoil example (TS123) - out of production for almost 2 years.
The replacement filter (EA123) is a completely different design and significantly more efficient.

The AC Delco in the example is the latest version.

That's not really a legitimate comparison.
Old 11-07-2007, 12:49 PM
  #12  
Registered User

 
jyeung528's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Temple City
Posts: 8,595
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

hmm...

should i replace the KN filter with the stock filter, but keep the K&N pipe...
Old 11-07-2007, 02:01 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Tyraid2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

where do we get an AC delco filter for our car?
Old 11-07-2007, 02:02 PM
  #14  
Registered User

 
driftintherain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it's because KnN is high flow air filter.... since it is a high flow filter, filters holes are bigger so they allow more air to flow through the filter. which means you are going to have more dirt flowing through the filter..
Old 11-07-2007, 02:16 PM
  #15  

 
omgitsoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GinoGT,Nov 7 2007, 10:20 AM
That doesn't make sense to be. These guys are into diesel trucks. That means big displacement with lots and lots of boost from the turbo. If that isn't an engine that flows massive amounts of air, I don't know what is.
"However, if a filter is using "better airflow" as their marketing tool, remember this....Does it flow better? At very high airflow volumes, probably. BUT, Our trucks CAN'T flow that much air unless super-modified, so what is the point? The stock filter will flow MORE THAN ENOUGH AIR to give you ALL THE HORSEPOWER the engine has to give"
Old 11-07-2007, 03:07 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
INTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old news really. I've seen this on several forums.

K+N promises how many dyno HP? Look at all of the CAI testing data for the car, one even posted a week ago. The Stock works really well.
Old 11-07-2007, 05:16 PM
  #17  
Former Moderator

Thread Starter
 
Ubetit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Columbus
Posts: 10,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This report was from 7/2004. It's not THAT old.
Old 11-07-2007, 07:46 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
SenderGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monrovia
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Neutered Sputniks,Nov 7 2007, 12:35 PM
I have a mechanic buddy who repeatedly tells me not to drop a K&N filter into anything I drive. The oils eventually wear out the mass airflow sensor and after he and some friends dyno tested their cars/trucks before and after installing K&N kits, they found that they actually LOST power.
S2000 does not have a Mass Airflow Sensor (MAF).
Old 11-07-2007, 09:46 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Almaden Valley, CA
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess I just kind of shrug when I see this data as it means nothing to me. I go by what I have personally experienced. I have used K&N filters in every car I have owned since college (1988 Accord LXi, 1993 Integra GSR, 1994 Accord EX, 2002 S2000 and 2003 WRX).

The first two never had engine issues and went well over 100K miles before I sold them. I still have the last three and all running flawlessly including the 1994 Accord with 191K miles and counting. I am pretty good about checking the air filters 3 or 4 times a year and make sure not to over oil them as that can cause MAF issues. If I had to guess, I've probably saved close to $1K in air filters and kept hundreds of disposable ones out of the dump. I'm not a tree hugger, but I do care about doing my part.

I could care less about some test when my experience speaks for itself.



Jimbo
Old 11-08-2007, 01:21 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Neutered Sputniks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,712
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SenderGreen,Nov 7 2007, 08:46 PM
S2000 does not have a Mass Airflow Sensor (MAF).
So the S2000 is the only vehicle anyone here drives? I could swear my GMC truck has a MAF that would be affected...

Regardless, besides a louder intake, there is really very little to no power gains to be had by switching away from stock (as I said, some vehicles actually LOST power when running a K&N filter).


Quick Reply: Interesting read on air filters



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:51 AM.