S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

How resistant is the thrust bearing to damage?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-04-2011, 12:20 PM
  #11  
Registered User

 
SpitfireS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 17 ft below sea level.
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

#2 main bearing is at the rear


Well.. #2 is the first available crank main where you can put thrust washers at both sides.

Old 01-05-2011, 07:01 AM
  #12  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

The #2 bearing is at flywheel end of the block?!? Isn't that cylinder 4?! I figured the #2 bearing would be between Cylinder 1 and Cylinder 2...
Old 01-05-2011, 07:29 AM
  #13  
Registered User

 
SpitfireS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 17 ft below sea level.
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Hmm...
I guess I'm the idiot here.


You're right.
Cyl #4 is closest to the firewall.
The crank has 5 main bearings.
That makes the bearing we talked about #4.

Are you reading this too Robert O?


Old 01-05-2011, 04:56 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Robert O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Corpus Christi Texas
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SpitfireS,Jan 5 2011, 08:29 AM
Hmm...
I guess I'm the idiot here.


You're right.
Cyl #4 is closest to the firewall.
The crank has 5 main bearings.
That makes the bearing we talked about #4.

Are you reading this too Robert O?


I just did.And since I'm not incapable of error I thought you guys sorted that out very nicely.
Old 01-06-2011, 01:18 PM
  #15  

 
slalom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Granville OH
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpitfireS,Jan 4 2011, 03:02 PM
* another reason not the start the enigne with the clutch in.
I'm not sure what you're suggesting here. Unless you changed your stock setup, you can't start your car without pressing down the clutch pedal. The interlock disables the starter solenoid.

Besides - the added load would put additional strain on the starter, especially in cold weather.
Old 01-06-2011, 02:11 PM
  #16  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Lots of FI guys disable the clutch interlock so they can start the car in neutral with the clutch engaged. I don't see how it would put a signficant amount of additional load on the starter.
Old 01-06-2011, 03:04 PM
  #17  

 
SheDrivesIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Land of Cincinnati Chili
Posts: 9,901
Received 241 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Mostly irrelevant, I'd imagine. I've never really heard of there being a crank walk issue with S2000s.
Old 01-06-2011, 09:50 PM
  #18  
Registered User

 
SpitfireS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 17 ft below sea level.
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

slalom44 Posted on Jan 6 2011, 11:18 PM
I'm not sure what you're suggesting here.
In my honest European opinion, the clutch-in-to-start-safety-feature is in the same catagory as the "This coffey might be hot" and "Don't microwave your pet" warnings signs.


Actually, I used to start all the manual cars I've owned with the clutch in: to start the engine you don't need to drag the gearbox along.
After reading a post (or a couple, I don't recall) about crank walk on S2k's with the old style ACT PP I decided to stop doing that.
What I do know for sure is that ACT changed the spring design to lower the disengagement force while clamping force decreased only slightly, at the cost of some travel, compared to the old style ACT PP.

IMO (no matter what PP you have): no load on the thrust is better than a load, during a cold start.

Old 01-07-2011, 07:53 AM
  #19  
Registered User

 
crank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gernby,Jan 6 2011, 03:11 PM
Lots of FI guys disable the clutch interlock so they can start the car in neutral with the clutch engaged. I don't see how it would put a signficant amount of additional load on the starter.
the starter spins the tranny now along with the engine...although i too believe NO load on the thrust bearings is better during a cold start. I would rather replace a starter the thrust bearings
Old 01-07-2011, 08:06 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
-Jordan-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SheDrivesIt,Jan 6 2011, 04:04 PM
Mostly irrelevant, I'd imagine. I've never really heard of there being a crank walk issue with S2000s.
^This.

You could ride your OEM clutch for years and not damage the thrust bearing surface.

Concider the fact that it only takes a couple hundred lbs to release the clutch pedal and the thrust is made from material and lubricated in the same way as the main and rod bearings. These surfaces see literal TONS of pressure on an ongoing basis. I guarantee you did not damage your thrust bearing in any way.

Also, find comfort in knowing that people run pressure plates twice as heavy as stock for thousands of miles of track mileage and abuse without damaging their thrust bearings.


Quick Reply: How resistant is the thrust bearing to damage?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 PM.