S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Have a question who TRUELY knows about turbos

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-19-2001, 05:55 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
MyBad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Turbo's......Something Afgans wear on their heads?
Old 10-19-2001, 06:32 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
LO CACHE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fyi-
I am not sure about the math of HP gains with or without the intercooler but, my roomate gained a full second in the 1/4 mile of his eclipse by upgrading hit stock intercooler with a 24" FMIC. -3x's the size.

D
Old 10-19-2001, 09:15 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
bgrubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by LO CACHE
[B]fyi-
I am not sure about the math of HP gains with or without the intercooler but, my roomate gained a full second in the 1/4 mile of his eclipse by upgrading hit stock intercooler with a 24" FMIC. -3x's the size.
Old 10-19-2001, 09:24 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Tanqueray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Question: 'Maximum Boost', Bell's turbo book, says that most turbos suffer from heat-soak, since the intercoolers are not designed to continue cooling the intake charge for more than 15-30 seconds.

Why is that? Do manufacturers assume that turbos aren't needed for longer periods of sustained use (i.e., at the track)?
Old 10-19-2001, 09:33 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
bgrubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tanqueray
[B]Question: 'Maximum Boost', Bell's turbo book, says that most turbos suffer from heat-soak, since the intercoolers are not designed to continue cooling the intake charge for more than 15-30 seconds.

Why is that?
Old 10-20-2001, 07:48 AM
  #36  
RT

 
RT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 14,268
Received 41 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Ben, nicely put, thanks for taking the time to explain the cost vs benefits of the Intercooler.

Tan, don't be so quick to throw out good old Corky's name. He doesn't have as good a reputation as he thinks he has. Have you ever talked/engineered with the guy? Dude does stuff half a$$ at best. I don't dispute his knowledge, just his "gleaming" reputation.
Old 10-21-2001, 02:56 AM
  #37  
Registered User

 
mike2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: calgary
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Excuse me fellows for butting in, but it seems to me that the objective of boosting is to provide more air i.e. Oxygen for combustion and the intercooler while reducing the compressed air temperature may reduce some of its pressure but it does not reduce the air mass and therefore not cause a reduction in power. In other words, the engine power is a function of Oxygen input and not its pressure. That is why the more efficient is your intercooler the more air, boost the engine can handle, to a limit of course.
Thermodynamics 101 anyone?
Old 10-21-2001, 09:57 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Tanqueray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by mike2k
[B]Excuse me fellows for butting in, but it seems to me that the objective of boosting is to provide more air i.e. Oxygen for combustion and the intercooler while reducing the compressed air temperature may reduce some of its pressure but it does not reduce the air mass and therefore not cause a reduction in power. In other words, the engine power is a function of Oxygen input and not its pressure. That is why the more efficient is your intercooler the more air, boost the engine can handle, to a limit of course.
Old 10-21-2001, 12:51 PM
  #39  
RT

 
RT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 14,268
Received 41 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally posted by mike2k
..................................
....
Thermodynamics 101 anyone?
Yeah, Fluids too, but apparently not you
(potato in the intake is worse than same potato in the exhaust)
Old 10-21-2001, 01:58 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
bgrubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by mike2k
[B]Excuse me fellows for butting in, but it seems to me that the objective of boosting is to provide more air i.e. Oxygen for combustion and the intercooler while reducing the compressed air temperature may reduce some of its pressure but it does not reduce the air mass and therefore not cause a reduction in power. In other words, the engine power is a function of Oxygen input and not its pressure. That is why the more efficient is your intercooler the more air, boost the engine can handle, to a limit of course.


Quick Reply: Have a question who TRUELY knows about turbos



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 AM.