S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

FIPK: What is difference between 63 and 57 series?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-06-2005, 05:45 AM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,349
Received 411 Likes on 228 Posts
Default FIPK: What is difference between 63 and 57 series?

I am having part # 57-3514 shipped to me now. I looked up the product application guide on K&N's website and they recommended #63-3514.

Please tell me that 57-3514 will fit my 2005 model fine? From the product application guide it shows that 57-3514 fits the 2004 model and to my knowledge there is no difference, right?
Old 10-06-2005, 05:59 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Fencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You're fine, the 57-3514 is the correct part. I've had one on my S for about 6 months now. If I remember, the 63-3514 is for off-road, track use only or not C.A.R.B. approved??? Take that with a grain of salt because it coming from memory and I can't look it up right now.

Enjoy the intake.
Old 10-06-2005, 07:55 AM
  #3  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,349
Received 411 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fencer,Oct 6 2005, 05:59 AM
You're fine, the 57-3514 is the correct part. I've had one on my S for about 6 months now. If I remember, the 63-3514 is for off-road, track use only or not C.A.R.B. approved??? Take that with a grain of salt because it coming from memory and I can't look it up right now.

Enjoy the intake.
Thanks for the info, Fencer!

Did you notice any SOTP difference with the intake? How is the sound?
Old 10-06-2005, 08:41 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Fencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know what SOTP is... but I replaced the stock intake during the middle of the SoCal summer and the heat soak disappeared. As far as the sound goes...the first time I hit vtec, I'm man enough to admit that I giggled
Old 10-06-2005, 09:20 AM
  #5  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,349
Received 411 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fencer,Oct 6 2005, 08:41 AM
I don't know what SOTP is... but I replaced the stock intake during the middle of the SoCal summer and the heat soak disappeared. As far as the sound goes...the first time I hit vtec, I'm man enough to admit that I giggled
Seat Of The Pants (how did the butt dyno register any increased power)?

yeah, I figured this would be a fun mod for sound alone. Glad I got the right part ordered. Did you install it yourself? How was the install?
Old 10-06-2005, 11:48 AM
  #6  
Registered User

 
Elistan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 15,323
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Weird. Do a search for intakes for an '00 to '04 model and they say the #57 version. A search for an '05 model results in #63.

Exact same specs, filters, pictures...
http://www.knfilters.com/search/prod...x?Prod=57-3514
http://www.knfilters.com/search/prod...x?Prod=63-3514

As Fencer said, the only difference I can see is the CARB thing.

Installation is super easy.
Old 10-06-2005, 01:45 PM
  #7  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,349
Received 411 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Thanks, Mark. Weird they change the whole 'series' just to indicate a CARB exemption.
Old 10-06-2005, 06:55 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Fencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The install was fairly easy; it took me about two hours. I was going slow and triple checking everything. Just don't confuse the vacuum lines and you'll be fine. As far as butt dyno...I didn't notice anything. You have to remember the gain won't be any more than 5-10HP. On a 200hp car that's 5% difference or less. I would challenge anyone who said they "felt" a difference.

I did shorten some of the vacuum lines to route them better than the directions show. Some have a tendancy to flop around. I can take a picture if you like.
Old 10-06-2005, 07:50 PM
  #9  

 
Picturepro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 949
Posts: 22,143
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

63-3514 is not Carb but it is being tested on a MY05
57-3514 is Carb approved for MY00 to 04

same part just a different # kuz MY05 is not carb approved yet

I've had it on MY05 for almost 6 months ... works great
Old 10-07-2005, 06:13 AM
  #10  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,349
Received 411 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Fencer,

No picture is necessary, though I really appreciate you offering to do that. I just installed a K&N FIPK on my fiance's IS300 and have installed intakes in several cars in the past, so I'm not expecting a problem.

I figured I wouldn't feel much in the way of a power gain, I just like that intake noise under heavy throttle and high rpm. A few horsies is just icing on the cake.

I've never really looked much at the K&N FIPK systems as I've always use AEM, Injen, and Iceman in the past, but these K&N systems really are quite nice and well-engineered. I guess that's a benefit of getting an intake from an established, well-run, large company like K&N.


Quick Reply: FIPK: What is difference between 63 and 57 series?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:07 AM.