FIPK II Dyno Results
#13
Thread Starter
I don't get much heatsoak.... Of course I have the cooling plate. The box pretty much protects it. That dyno was done on a pretty humid day also. Both times. Mid-day. I wanted to see realistic numbers.
#17
Registered User
I always thought that an intake would lean it out. Guess i'm wrong.
The 2004+ have a leaner mixer via OEM ECU, putting on a intake must have made it richer and therefore more room to tune
I dont see how people can account for better gas mileage, when it runs richer
I'm surprised that K&N didn't post the Torque #'s!!!! Those look great.
The 2004+ have a leaner mixer via OEM ECU, putting on a intake must have made it richer and therefore more room to tune
I dont see how people can account for better gas mileage, when it runs richer
I'm surprised that K&N didn't post the Torque #'s!!!! Those look great.
#18
Originally Posted by JustinC,Sep 12 2007, 11:38 PM
I don't get much heatsoak.... Of course I have the cooling plate. The box pretty much protects it. That dyno was done on a pretty humid day also. Both times. Mid-day. I wanted to see realistic numbers.
#20
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by iDomN8U,Sep 13 2007, 07:19 AM
I always thought that an intake would lean it out. Guess i'm wrong.
The 2004+ have a leaner mixer via OEM ECU, putting on a intake must have made it richer and therefore more room to tune
I dont see how people can account for better gas mileage, when it runs richer
I'm surprised that K&N didn't post the Torque #'s!!!! Those look great.
The 2004+ have a leaner mixer via OEM ECU, putting on a intake must have made it richer and therefore more room to tune
I dont see how people can account for better gas mileage, when it runs richer
I'm surprised that K&N didn't post the Torque #'s!!!! Those look great.