S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

FIPK II Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-12-2007, 07:16 PM
  #11  

 
txs2knoah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bayside
Posts: 8,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mo moneyzzz.

i'ma invest in a 02-03 ecU. I NEED MO POWAZ
Old 09-12-2007, 07:27 PM
  #12  
Registered User

 
nightcrawler7188's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,158
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

it's a good intake--in the nighttime.

during the day it heatsoaked like crazy, but in the night i felt the gain
Old 09-12-2007, 07:38 PM
  #13  

Thread Starter
 
JustinC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Selma, TX
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't get much heatsoak.... Of course I have the cooling plate. The box pretty much protects it. That dyno was done on a pretty humid day also. Both times. Mid-day. I wanted to see realistic numbers.
Old 09-12-2007, 07:47 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Johnny Sack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: formerly versionJDM
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

FIPK FTW!
Old 09-12-2007, 08:12 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
S2Kstuntin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Waianae,HI
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

YAYA! I have yet to install mine, but I am ever so excited
Old 09-13-2007, 02:37 AM
  #16  
Registered User

 
CBRE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sewickley, PA
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run one and my car runs great.
Old 09-13-2007, 05:19 AM
  #17  
Registered User

 
iDomN8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7,430
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I always thought that an intake would lean it out. Guess i'm wrong.

The 2004+ have a leaner mixer via OEM ECU, putting on a intake must have made it richer and therefore more room to tune

I dont see how people can account for better gas mileage, when it runs richer

I'm surprised that K&N didn't post the Torque #'s!!!! Those look great.
Old 09-13-2007, 05:32 AM
  #18  
Registered User

 
nightcrawler7188's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,158
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JustinC,Sep 12 2007, 11:38 PM
I don't get much heatsoak.... Of course I have the cooling plate. The box pretty much protects it. That dyno was done on a pretty humid day also. Both times. Mid-day. I wanted to see realistic numbers.
i had the AUT CF cooling plate too but it still heatsoaked like crazy in the hot summer days here
Old 09-13-2007, 05:50 AM
  #19  
Registered User

 
silverstonejedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

V2
Old 09-13-2007, 06:36 AM
  #20  

Thread Starter
 
JustinC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Selma, TX
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by iDomN8U,Sep 13 2007, 07:19 AM
I always thought that an intake would lean it out. Guess i'm wrong.

The 2004+ have a leaner mixer via OEM ECU, putting on a intake must have made it richer and therefore more room to tune

I dont see how people can account for better gas mileage, when it runs richer

I'm surprised that K&N didn't post the Torque #'s!!!! Those look great.
What is really crazy is that I do get better gas mileage. If I drive it hard I can still get 24mpg. Before I was around 20.


Quick Reply: FIPK II Dyno Results



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 PM.