Dyno numbers & Mods
06-22-2003, 01:14 PM
#43
Originally posted by reds2
Weren't you running the IDI intake when you did this pull? Probably didn't gain anything from the intake, but it wasn't the factory box.
Weren't you running the IDI intake when you did this pull? Probably didn't gain anything from the intake, but it wasn't the factory box.
Sure looks like a factory box to me with the IDI in front.
UL opened up the box and did one run to measure the restriction and the IDI did restrict. I'm sorry, I forgot which parameter he measured.
06-22-2003, 03:13 PM
#45
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Mesa
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sideways,
I meant it wasn't the factory box by itself. I didn't think my memory was that bad seeing how I was there.
Brian,
Dynojets, Dynapacks, and Mustang Dynos are different types of dynos. You remove the drive wheels with Dynapacks.
I meant it wasn't the factory box by itself. I didn't think my memory was that bad seeing how I was there.
Brian,
Dynojets, Dynapacks, and Mustang Dynos are different types of dynos. You remove the drive wheels with Dynapacks.
11-26-2003, 04:27 PM
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. 230 hp at 8450 rpm 150 ft lbs at 6340 rpm
2. Superflow chassis dyno
3. Electromotive Tec III, open exhaust with home built header extension, and 2.73 rear end
4. About 160 mph
5. 2002
6. 3rd gear so we didn't overspeed the dyno
I am continually amazed by this motor! Also, there must be an awful lot of power lost in the stock exhaust sytem and/or the stock ECU, and the stock rear end, because we almost always run 220 hp and above without too much effort. And all I've done is dump the exhaust out of basically the stock headers about four feet back from the head, and install a TEC III system to run both ignition and injectors.
Seems like I got about 20-25 hp for about $1800. But I never dynoed the motor with the factory setup.
Ciao,
Jim
2. Superflow chassis dyno
3. Electromotive Tec III, open exhaust with home built header extension, and 2.73 rear end
4. About 160 mph
5. 2002
6. 3rd gear so we didn't overspeed the dyno
I am continually amazed by this motor! Also, there must be an awful lot of power lost in the stock exhaust sytem and/or the stock ECU, and the stock rear end, because we almost always run 220 hp and above without too much effort. And all I've done is dump the exhaust out of basically the stock headers about four feet back from the head, and install a TEC III system to run both ignition and injectors.
Seems like I got about 20-25 hp for about $1800. But I never dynoed the motor with the factory setup.
Ciao,
Jim
11-26-2003, 04:55 PM
#47
Registered User
Originally posted by brian_k03
Dont wanna look like an idiot but what the heck is dynojet or dynopak? is it a mod or type o way to dyno or...
Dont wanna look like an idiot but what the heck is dynojet or dynopak? is it a mod or type o way to dyno or...
11-27-2003, 01:51 PM
#48
Dynojet measures horsepower to the ground, i.e. losses through the wheels are included. Dynapack measures power at the wheel *hubs* (i.e. you actually remove the wheels and bolt the dyno to the hubs), so it's independent of the wheels, but tends to read 5-8 hp higher on an NA S2K.
11-27-2003, 02:56 PM
#49
276.5 rwhp
178# torque
max hp @8350 rpm
4th gear
Vortech at 7.0 psi
neuspeed exhaust
444's
2002
Dynojet
178# torque
max hp @8350 rpm
4th gear
Vortech at 7.0 psi
neuspeed exhaust
444's
2002
Dynojet
11-27-2003, 09:46 PM
#50
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran mine in 3rd gear and then 4th gear and overlaid the two graphs were almost exactly the same. I was expecting 4th to give higher numbers but found no difference between the two worth mentioning. I thought you guys would want to know.