S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Does the 00/01 ECU run rich?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-06-2010, 11:15 AM
  #21  
Member (Premium)
 
starchland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,272
Received 91 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Disgustipated,Aug 6 2010, 01:51 AM
That's if you're going 60-65 the whole way... drag decreases MPG a whole lot past 65 MPH.
yeah, and we were talking about mpg not speed

anyway good mpg is attainable in this car, its all about driving style, at least that is an option
Old 08-06-2010, 11:54 AM
  #22  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by starchland,Aug 6 2010, 02:15 PM
yeah, and we were talking about mpg not speed
I can't tell if you are joking here, so I apologize if you are, but you really seem to be missing the point here. Fuel economy and speed are VERY, VERY related. As speed increases, aerodynamic drag increases EXPONENTIALLY, so MPG goes down exponentially as cruising speed increases. If you cruise at 55 MPH with the top up, you'll probably get over 35 MPG. If you cruise at 85 MPH with the top down, you'll probably get less than 25 MPG.
Old 08-06-2010, 12:13 PM
  #23  

 
S2k_MoZo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The best I got in my 01 back when I had it was 28MPG with 100% highway driving but I've got a heavy foot.
Now, my car did run rich and my car was never stock so the comparision won't be much of a help to you but switching to 02-03 ECU made a huge difference. I could feel a lot more torque down low and the tune is totally different and doesn't run as rich. You can find 02-03 ECUs used for around $100. Might be worth spending money into if you are going to drive that car everyday. One of the best investments I made on my AP1!
Just my .02 cents.
Old 08-06-2010, 12:41 PM
  #24  
Member (Premium)
 
starchland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,272
Received 91 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gernby,Aug 6 2010, 11:54 AM
I can't tell if you are joking here, so I apologize if you are, but you really seem to be missing the point here. Fuel economy and speed are VERY, VERY related. As speed increases, aerodynamic drag increases EXPONENTIALLY, so MPG goes down exponentially as cruising speed increases. If you cruise at 55 MPH with the top up, you'll probably get over 35 MPG. If you cruise at 85 MPH with the top down, you'll probably get less than 25 MPG.
I think your reading into it wrong
Old 08-06-2010, 01:31 PM
  #25  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I agree that an '02-'03 ECU would increase power, but it shouldn't make any difference at all for highway fuel economy. No modern car runs rich while cruising on the highway unless something is wrong with it.
Old 08-06-2010, 01:33 PM
  #26  
Registered User

 
FluKy15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 14,697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow starch, you baby that thing. I get like 18L/100 km, city and highway combined

I average about 300-350km per tank, combined city and highway.
Old 08-06-2010, 01:50 PM
  #27  
Member (Premium)
 
starchland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,272
Received 91 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

lol sometimes Ive seen how you drive
Old 08-06-2010, 01:58 PM
  #28  
Member (Premium)
 
Disgustipated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,671
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by starchland,Aug 6 2010, 01:41 PM
I think your reading into it wrong
I think you totally just missed the point AGAIN. Did you even read or understand what he said at all?
Old 08-06-2010, 03:02 PM
  #29  
Member (Premium)
 
starchland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,272
Received 91 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I was referring to the guy who said you must have been cruising at 60-65 as if tryin to discredit how I got 33 US mpg. I was just stating that I have attained 33 mpg, again , I wasnt talking about speed. And I know how fuel economy works thats how I got 33.
Old 08-06-2010, 03:33 PM
  #30  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by starchland,Aug 6 2010, 06:02 PM
I was referring to the guy who said you must have been cruising at 60-65 as if tryin to discredit how I got 33 US mpg. I was just stating that I have attained 33 mpg, again , I wasnt talking about speed. And I know how fuel economy works thats how I got 33.
How dense can you be? If you are going to claim 33 MPG, you need to divulge your cruising speed! If you were cruising at 55 MPH, then 33 MPG isn't very impressive, but if you were cruising at 85 MPH, then I would say 33 MPG is impossible.


Quick Reply: Does the 00/01 ECU run rich?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 AM.