Custom Oil Catch tank Completed *56k Users Beware
#22
Former Moderator
Thread Starter
Mine sees 7.5psi of positive pressure. I'd just rather have threaded fittings than grommets. I really think threaded bungs and hose barbs would be more durable in the long run.
#23
BTW, with this can, you really don't even need a baffle, since the outlet is recessed at the top, in the center, and it is not "in the line of sight" of the inlet. It also has a quick release drain valve at the bottom.
I got this from fperra, so I don't even know who makes it.
I mounted mine on the H beam in front of the engine, since I have an AEM.
I got this from fperra, so I don't even know who makes it.
I mounted mine on the H beam in front of the engine, since I have an AEM.
#24
Originally posted by Slows2k
Mine sees 7.5psi of positive pressure. I'd just rather have threaded fittings than grommets. I really think threaded bungs and hose barbs would be more durable in the long run.
Mine sees 7.5psi of positive pressure. I'd just rather have threaded fittings than grommets. I really think threaded bungs and hose barbs would be more durable in the long run.
#26
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm seeing 9 psi of positive pressure, but it never gets to the catch because there is a KrankVent between the catch can and the intake manifold. I would never rely on the PCV valve to block positive pressure.
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The PCV valve wont work as a one way check valve, like a KrankVent will.
Anyways, not trying to sidetrack the thread into a krankvent discussion...