Coasting
#11
Thread Starter
I don't think you're going to noticeably save much life. When your clutch is depressed you're using the throwout bearing and applying the wear to a different area, when it's fully engaged (let off the clutch in neutral or let off the clutch in gear) it's not taking on any more wear. The wear on a clutch happens in that in-between time where it's still slipping on the flywheel. If you want to try and save life on it rev matching is your best friend between gears.
The clutch is just a huge brake in a lot of ways.
however this is all just a never ending debate and people will argue it for years until we all drive electric cars without transmissions.
I think the bigger argument is that you may be worried about extra engine wear with engine braking vs using the brakes.
coasting to a stop in neutral or clutch depressed uses fuel to keep the engine running
coasting to a stop in gear will shut off injector and save fuel as JFusion has stated
I've tried testing all of this over and over and over again throughout the years on my cars and well I can never get any definitive evidence that it really saves you in fuel since i had to go WOT to get around someone and threw my fuel economy off.
so to fully answer your question of whether neutral coasting/stopping vs engine breaking will prolong the life of your clutch. these two words I think work the best "Maybe" and "It Depends"
you're still going to put that clutch to use to get it back into gear from your coasting state. I guess if you do a steady progression of multiple engages/disengages down through the gears yes you are adding more wear than engine breaking in one gear or neutral or clutch depressed.
The clutch is just a huge brake in a lot of ways.
however this is all just a never ending debate and people will argue it for years until we all drive electric cars without transmissions.
I think the bigger argument is that you may be worried about extra engine wear with engine braking vs using the brakes.
coasting to a stop in neutral or clutch depressed uses fuel to keep the engine running
coasting to a stop in gear will shut off injector and save fuel as JFusion has stated
I've tried testing all of this over and over and over again throughout the years on my cars and well I can never get any definitive evidence that it really saves you in fuel since i had to go WOT to get around someone and threw my fuel economy off.
so to fully answer your question of whether neutral coasting/stopping vs engine breaking will prolong the life of your clutch. these two words I think work the best "Maybe" and "It Depends"
you're still going to put that clutch to use to get it back into gear from your coasting state. I guess if you do a steady progression of multiple engages/disengages down through the gears yes you are adding more wear than engine breaking in one gear or neutral or clutch depressed.
Thanks for the tips
#12
Thread Starter
#13
Thread Starter
Thanks
#15
I don't like downshifting as I approach a stop using engine braking. I pretty much keep it in gear as long as I can and as I slowly approach the stop I will kick it out gear. You are right about it being easier to service the brakes. I pretty much take it out of gear within the last 20 feet of approaching the stop, not like hundreds of feet, and obviously before the engine starts lugging. It does depend on what gear you are in as you approach the stop.
I do get great fuel economy out of my daily Civic doing this.
#16
I like downshifting to a stop. Then, if traffic starts up, again --- you are good to go. Neutral only near or at complete stops.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eyeofthetiger
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
26
12-27-2004 11:12 AM