Camshaft failure
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Originally posted by allenheathdj
I wonder if the SPEC A, now version 3's are better.
I wonder if the SPEC A, now version 3's are better.
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
Originally posted by allenheathdj
they re-did the spec A cam 3 times....spec A v1, spec A v.2 and now they have the spec A V.2 with different material
they re-did the spec A cam 3 times....spec A v1, spec A v.2 and now they have the spec A V.2 with different material
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What were your running in procedures?
Sorry if you mentioned it before but there is ALOT to read through.
The failure on the nose leads to simple fact that an inccorect running in procedure where no enough rpm was used for long enough and the material wasnt allowed to work harden. The highest loadings on teh cam at idle are on the nose.
With a roller follower setup its even more important since work hardening takes more time and no hydrodynamic wedge is able to form to protect the nose of the cam.
The VTEC lobe probably wasnt damaged since the loadings at idle are very small in comparison, and when its activated at high rpm the majority of the forces are on the BCD.
Sorry if you mentioned it before but there is ALOT to read through.
The failure on the nose leads to simple fact that an inccorect running in procedure where no enough rpm was used for long enough and the material wasnt allowed to work harden. The highest loadings on teh cam at idle are on the nose.
With a roller follower setup its even more important since work hardening takes more time and no hydrodynamic wedge is able to form to protect the nose of the cam.
The VTEC lobe probably wasnt damaged since the loadings at idle are very small in comparison, and when its activated at high rpm the majority of the forces are on the BCD.
#19
Registered User
Only unhardened cams need to be "work hardened" which is not the kind of cam you want in any engine you want to last. Even Delta who specializes in regrinds induction hardens their cams. I am quite certain based on the hardness test results that the Todas were hardened at their factory.
The engine was run at idle until the engine started to warm, then run at 2000-3000 RPM for about 20 minutes.
The engine was run at idle until the engine started to warm, then run at 2000-3000 RPM for about 20 minutes.
#20
Registered User
Thread Starter
Not sure what the run-in procedures were. In fact, I wasn't aware that billet cams like these required any special run-in procedure. When I picked the car up (after the initial install), I drove it straight from marcucci's shop to my house (about 50-60 miles) at freeway speeds, so if there was any break-in necessary, that should've done it. The cams didn't fail until 2000 miles later.
Can you explain what a "hydrodynamic wedge" is? I'm not a physics major, so I've never heard that term before.
Edit: I've got to start typing my replies faster.
Can you explain what a "hydrodynamic wedge" is? I'm not a physics major, so I've never heard that term before.
Edit: I've got to start typing my replies faster.