S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Apparently you shouldnt downshift?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-23-2003, 03:45 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
NoTorq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rochester
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ravenwerk
[B]For over thirty years now I've been under the impression that "being smooth" is a goal that most drivers attempt to achieve at some point with their skill.
Old 06-23-2003, 04:03 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Ravenwerk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dragon country
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Daveg27,
Point well taken. I stand corrected.
I was (of course) referring to drivers that are concerned with improving their ability to become "one with the machine" but your clarification is (sadly) too true.
Old 06-23-2003, 04:28 PM
  #13  
Registered User

 
Bret's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Canton
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Ravenwerk
If you would sir, please enlighten me with your source of info on this point.
It's in the Car Designers Bible, Version 3, 2nd Edition. No, just kidding. I make this statement as an industrial engineer (for what that's worth) and with the understanding of how people drive stick shifts. If you needed to rev match in order to drive, the vast majority of the people that can drive stick shift cars would not be able to. In addition, if they had wanted one to drive that way, then they would have put it in the owners manual. The S2000 manual says nothing about rev matching, just upshifting and downshifting. As a matter of fact, I'd be willing to bet that there is not an owners manual out there for a production car that even talks about rev matching. But, bottom line, no real source other than my personal observations.

For over thirty years now I've been under the impression that "being smooth" is a goal that most drivers attempt to achieve at some point with their skill.
Even so, I've only seen it once.

I may be wrong in assuming that the S was made specifically for "enthusiasts" but I would consider their opinion of a higher caliber than someone who doesn't know the meaning or understand the simple concept of "rev matching".
I think your assumption is correct. I was just trying to make the point that most drivers don't know what it is and if it was necessary, they would.

This I can relate to. But finesse in shifting skills is greatly desired by those in the know and "rev matching" is certainly part of that.
I agree. It's just a skill that (I believe) the vast majority of manual transmission drivers would not care to attempt to acquire simply because it requires effort and a love for driving in order to do so.
Old 06-23-2003, 04:28 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
NoTorq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rochester
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was (of course) referring to drivers that are concerned with improving their ability to become "one with the machine" but your clarification is (sadly) too true.
I suspected you were referring to people like us when you said "most drivers" but sadly we are definitely in the minority. And as a result Honda does have to make sure that their transmisions will hold up to non-rev-matched downshifts. Why bother with synchros if everyone rev matches?
Old 06-23-2003, 07:46 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
RazorV3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: VA is for hustlaz
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

btw when a person downshifts and the car does not jerk around and is very smooth, you know you did an excellent downshift, almost like an automatic transmission. well atleast thats what my passengers tell me.
Old 06-23-2003, 08:45 PM
  #16  
Registered User

 
SuperDyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm no expert... but dont cars have a synchronization sorta thing going in them now that rev's the engine up for you if you downshift?

Now putting a car from 3rd to 2nd and dropping the clutch suddenly is, I'm sure, a no no. But I think doing that and slamming brakes is better than hitting a car infront of you.

Though to keep in mind, if you're using that sort of technique to brake at every street light, you're causing more wear than the car was designed for...

Again tho... I have no idea what the heck I'm talking about, just hearsay and speculation on my part =)
Old 06-23-2003, 09:01 PM
  #17  
Member (Premium)
 
twohoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redondo Beach
Posts: 4,027
Received 316 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

There are a few things going on here.

First (aside from smoothness), rev-matching is done primarily to reduce wear on the synchros, which are very expensive to replace. Yes, it saves wear on the clutch, too, but that's a comparatively easy/cheap repair since it's a wear item anyway.

Second, using lower gears to slow the car down is age-old advice intended for big ol' 50's and 60's American cars with teeny drum brakes and huge OHV motors. When, say, going down a mountain, those cars ran a real risk of burning up their brakes, so staying in lower gears to control speed was well advised. By contrast, you'd be hard-pressed to overwork any modern car's brakes in that sort of scenario.

With those things in mind, the risk of over-revving the engine becomes the main concern with downshifting, especially when considering the average skill level of everyday motorists. There may also be some merit to the simple idea of increased wear on the motor when engine-braking, compared to letting it just fall to idle in neutral.

So that's probably why you heard you shouldn't downshift.
Old 06-24-2003, 03:13 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
NoTorq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rochester
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by SuperDyu
I'm no expert... but dont cars have a synchronization sorta thing going in them now that rev's the engine up for you if you downshift?
Um.... No. The reason the engine is revving up "by itself" when you downshift is because the wheels are turning much faster than the engine relative to what gear you're in. Instead of the engine turning the wheels you've got the wheels turning the engine.

There is computer controlled rev matching but you only find that in cars like Ferrari's and BMW's equipped with SMG type transmissions. These are NOT at all like the "manumatic" transmissions available in most cars nowadays however.
Old 06-24-2003, 12:38 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
antek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Ravenwerk
I may be wrong in assuming that the S was made specifically for "enthusiasts" but I would consider their opinion of a higher caliber than someone who doesn't know the meaning or understand the simple concept of "rev matching".
If that is so, why are most dealers ignorant of our car?
Old 06-24-2003, 04:48 PM
  #20  

 
ruexp67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 79,195
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally posted by antek

If that is so, why are most dealers ignorant of our car?
Simply because most dealers are ignorant.


Quick Reply: Apparently you shouldnt downshift?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 PM.