Airbox Modification Discussion
#11
Originally posted by Cyber Logic
This is my concern...I am not sure whether a cold air intake would really help me because it is at least 100 here every day and 110 usually...and on top of that...at night it only gets down to like 90 so I am debating on the cold air intake idea...anyone in these temps notice a big change with a cold air intake???
This is my concern...I am not sure whether a cold air intake would really help me because it is at least 100 here every day and 110 usually...and on top of that...at night it only gets down to like 90 so I am debating on the cold air intake idea...anyone in these temps notice a big change with a cold air intake???
cheers,
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sugar Land
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tested the car the other day, it was in the mid 80's to high 80's. I was able to keep IAT fairly low, in the 100's I think during 40mph drive... I'lll have to check again though... could have my number mixed up.
-Shing
-Shing
#13
Registered User
Doesn't sound unreasonable shingles, any differential around 30F in motion is believable.
Just imagine, if you get that differential down to 10 degrees, you'll pick up 3-4 hp easily. If you remove some restriction in the intake tract (which there is, particularly on the airbox inlet and possible the filter/tube transition) there might be even more.
UL
Just imagine, if you get that differential down to 10 degrees, you'll pick up 3-4 hp easily. If you remove some restriction in the intake tract (which there is, particularly on the airbox inlet and possible the filter/tube transition) there might be even more.
UL
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne!
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by cdelena
It was my understanding that the biggest concern was making sure that the coolest air available is used since this ECU is quick to protect the engine as soon as it senses elevated intake air or coolant. I did not pickup on any suggestion that airflow is inadequate.
It was my understanding that the biggest concern was making sure that the coolest air available is used since this ECU is quick to protect the engine as soon as it senses elevated intake air or coolant. I did not pickup on any suggestion that airflow is inadequate.
Does anyone have thoughts or suggestions here other than the general principle of minimising angles and bends?
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bradenton
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about ducting into the fenderwell?
a lot of domestics suck air frominside the fenderwell and the S2K has a nice opening in the pax side fenderwell that accepts a 3" tube nicely.
I just redid my intake setup, took a WeaponR Dragon, cut it back 4", put a cold air bell over the filter and ran aluminum 3" tubing into the hole I mentioned in the fender.
It's as far as possible away from the motor and away from the radiator as well.
I was thinking about opening up the pax side brake duct area to flow more air inside the fender and maybe raise the pressure inside the fender. The whole fender can act as a cold air box.
Anyone see any holes in my idea?
If you're interested, I'll post pix.
-Venom
'00 B&R
www.reptilogic.com/s2k/
a lot of domestics suck air frominside the fenderwell and the S2K has a nice opening in the pax side fenderwell that accepts a 3" tube nicely.
I just redid my intake setup, took a WeaponR Dragon, cut it back 4", put a cold air bell over the filter and ran aluminum 3" tubing into the hole I mentioned in the fender.
It's as far as possible away from the motor and away from the radiator as well.
I was thinking about opening up the pax side brake duct area to flow more air inside the fender and maybe raise the pressure inside the fender. The whole fender can act as a cold air box.
Anyone see any holes in my idea?
If you're interested, I'll post pix.
-Venom
'00 B&R
www.reptilogic.com/s2k/
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sugar Land
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ultimate lurker
[B]Doesn't sound unreasonable shingles, any differential around 30F in motion is believable.
Just imagine, if you get that differential down to 10 degrees, you'll pick up 3-4 hp easily.
[B]Doesn't sound unreasonable shingles, any differential around 30F in motion is believable.
Just imagine, if you get that differential down to 10 degrees, you'll pick up 3-4 hp easily.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bradenton
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are a couple of quick pix.
It's nothing exotic but it ought to work, I'm making an aluminum plate to seal off the fender where the tube goes in and like I said in the other post, possibly opening up the brake duct into the fender.
-Venom
'00 B&R
It's nothing exotic but it ought to work, I'm making an aluminum plate to seal off the fender where the tube goes in and like I said in the other post, possibly opening up the brake duct into the fender.
-Venom
'00 B&R
#19
Registered User
Does anyone know enough about thermodynamics to postulate whether pulling air from a high-pressure area (like in front of the rad) is better than pulling it from a relatively closed space like the fenderwell? Barring temp. differences. I'm curious if the Spoon (rad snorkel) is a better "idea" than pulling the air from the fender, which may actually be a low pressure or vacuum at high speeds.
#20
Air from a high-pressure area does add to power and has been done with cars and motorcycles for years. But typically the payoff comes at speed, sometimes with no measurable gain until over 60mph and the most coming much faster than that.
IMO the biggest concern for this car is to avoid systems that feed the heated under-hood air so maybe the fender well accomplishes the important task even if you don
IMO the biggest concern for this car is to avoid systems that feed the heated under-hood air so maybe the fender well accomplishes the important task even if you don