4.77's
#21
Originally Posted by freshs2k,Dec 4 2006, 05:30 AM
just got my 4.77's installed on my ap2. i know that 16% more power? or torque? with the 4.77's. i have a k&n drop-in berk test pipe and exhaust. how much of an increase to the wheels am i looking at?
OT: but the guys with ITR's love the 4.928 and go crazy over 5.077 which is very hard to come by.
#22
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: No va
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
4.77 is probably as far as i would go for my daily driver. if it was strictly for race only then i might get the higher ratio. i will be headed to the strip to see what kind of difference the 4.77's really made for me as everyone with 4.77's 1/4 mile times will vary from driver to driver.
#27
Getting any of the shorter FD's(4.44 4.56 4.57 4.77) is worth it, each one has their pros/cons. The high revs on the highway wont affect gas mileage but they will affect the engine life and of course more noise. I have been in an ITR with the JDM 4.7 FD and one with the ATS 4.9 FD and both were stock, the one with the 4.9FD pulled a hell of a lot harder.
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 'round here
Posts: 51,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i had the 4.77 installed in my ap1, and the acceleration was great, but at highway speeds, i was almost in vtec at 74 mph. however, i my rear end went bad, and i'm dropping down the ricks 4.56, which is currently being installed, i'll update the difference when i get the car back.
#30
Originally Posted by jacqueshammer,Dec 7 2006, 10:43 AM
i had the 4.77 installed in my ap1, and the acceleration was great, but at highway speeds, i was almost in vtec at 74 mph. however, i my rear end went bad, and i'm dropping down the ricks 4.56, which is currently being installed, i'll update the difference when i get the car back.