S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

4.77 installed. Thumbs up!

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-20-2003, 05:13 AM
  #21  
Registered User

 
TurboVtk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bronxville/NY
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i get about 280-290 it depends sometimes i get 300 when driving like grandma, when i vtec daily i get 250. but that is till way low near the end.
Old 08-20-2003, 05:35 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
ace9250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by slick rick
[B]



I don't understand you guys.
Old 08-20-2003, 07:25 AM
  #23  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Prolene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Squeezer


use 6th gear anytime you are over 36 mph.
Pretty low for 6th gear stock. Hate to lug the engine.
Old 08-20-2003, 08:59 AM
  #24  
Registered User

 
jguerdat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Prolene
[B] Pretty low for 6th gear stock.
Old 08-20-2003, 09:09 AM
  #25  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I seriously doubt the F20C is as efficient at 2500 RPMs as it is at 3500 RPMs. Lugging an engine is not a good way to improve mileage.
Old 08-20-2003, 02:04 PM
  #26  
Registered User

 
jguerdat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

"It all depends." I'm talking about just driving around. Higher RPMs means higher pumping losses and frictional losses. Best fuel economy is generally around 35-40 mph in high gear. We ain't talking breathing at its sweet spot but whether there is harm or at least lack of fuel efficiency, not ultimate performance. Also, I'm not suggesting <1500 RPM in any gear due to NVH. It just isn't that big a thing...
Old 08-20-2003, 02:22 PM
  #27  
Member (Premium)
 
twohoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redondo Beach
Posts: 4,025
Received 310 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

I'm with you, Slick, I never get 200 miles on a tank unless it's at least 1/3 freeway miles. I've gotten about 300 on all-freeway stints, though, and that's at 75-85mph.
Old 08-20-2003, 02:39 PM
  #28  
jzr
Registered User
 
jzr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cdelena
[B]I am really interested in track impressions. With shorter gears you should be able to pull out of turns at a lower rpm, but there is more shifting. Does it force shifts in awkward spots and is it harder to be smooth with the number of shifts required?
Old 08-20-2003, 03:33 PM
  #29  
Registered User

 
TurboVtk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bronxville/NY
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

very true whatever you gain from 4.77 have to be subtracted whatever you loose for having to shift, it will of course depend on the track since they all have diff turns that are taken at diff speed.
Old 08-20-2003, 05:05 PM
  #30  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Prolene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cdelena
[B]I am really interested in track impressions. With shorter gears you should be able to pull out of turns at a lower rpm, but there is more shifting. Does it force shifts in awkward spots and is it harder to be smooth with the number of shifts required?


Quick Reply: 4.77 installed. Thumbs up!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 AM.