S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Why is the S2000 a better car than the 350z

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-03-2008, 03:07 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Stoic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: LaVergne, TN
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by qbmurderer13,Feb 3 2008, 09:45 AM
S2000's way much more fun to drive. And looks better IMO. Sure the 350z might be faster, but then if you get a 350z because its faster than an s2000, then your going to see ALOT more other cars that are much faster than the 350z. Plus you see z's every other minute. S2ks are much more rare.
That's subjective..

I do see alot more fairladies being driven where I live, but that's because I live by the Nissan plant. There are parts of town where S2K grow on trees also.
Old 02-03-2008, 03:39 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Davemeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Over 1 million 350Z's sold in the US vs. what, 80K S2000?

100:1 production ratio dictates that the Z is going to be dime-a-dozen virtually anywhere, far more commonplace than the S2000.

I owned a 350Z. There were things about it I liked, but way more things I did not like. I find the S2000 much more in line with what I was in the market for.
Old 02-03-2008, 03:58 PM
  #23  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Primary reason the S2000 is better to me: it's 500 lb. lighter. Secondary reason, the Z is pretty ungainly-looking. It's weight and awkwardness are both due to its being an Infiniti luxury sedan/coupe scrunched down to a 2-seat "sports car".

I didn't even consider the 350Z, and I'm a Nissan guy ('71 240Z, '91 240SX, '95 240SX).
Old 02-03-2008, 04:57 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
krshultz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Although I think nobody's given one the proper development yet, Nationals results show the S2000 to be the faster autocross car. S2000 is a proven winner in AS (which is a faster class), 350Z is in BS and hasn't caught the RX-8 yet.

Otherwise they're just different. I like them both. But, when the S2000 first came out, I've wanted one ever since. The 350Z just never grabbed my attention in quite the same way.
Old 02-03-2008, 05:01 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
f20milo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rightguard24,Feb 3 2008, 09:37 AM
the 350z has more torque, more horse power, quicker 0-60, faster 1/4 mile, a much more up to date interior, and even a little more cargo room.

So why do you think the s2000 is the better car ?
Well ITS NOT faster in the quarter (the 05 and up is tho) and you would have to drive them both to understand, the 350z has a little body roll and the s2000 has more race like movements, ive driven my friends 03 350z and the s2k to me feels like a way superior car, but thats just me Ohh and it might have more up to date interior but never will it have honda fit and finish!!! nissan honda
Old 02-03-2008, 05:05 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
s2kkyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im actually surprised to hear these reasonable responses, on alot of other forums you will get retarded comments "this car is better and superior just because!"

I like the 350z but I fell in love with the s because its a convertible, light, small, and screams when pushed (its a love or hate thing, but I love it, I don't like the monotone of the 350z as you accelerate IMO only)

to me what sold me was a drive on a nice summer night with the top down, i've always loved convertibles since
Old 02-03-2008, 05:15 PM
  #27  

 
chairmnofthboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,548
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The S2000 is a sports car, the 350Z is a sports like car. It share far to many parts with the Nissan SUV and other models for me to consider it a true sports car.

The 350Z interior is cheap and plasticy. Like most Nissan models, the earlier years had problems.

With all that said, I still like the 350Z, not more than an S though. If I were to get a 350Z, I would just get a G35 and have a practical car.
Old 02-03-2008, 05:24 PM
  #28  

 
SoMe0nE2tAlK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Noone's mentioned Honda reliability?
Old 02-03-2008, 05:41 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
Enthralled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chairmnofthboard,Feb 3 2008, 06:15 PM
If I were to get a 350Z, I would just get a G35 and have a practical car.
Old 02-03-2008, 06:01 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
f20milo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SoMe0nE2tAlK2,Feb 3 2008, 06:24 PM
Noone's mentioned Honda reliability?


Quick Reply: Why is the S2000 a better car than the 350z



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:33 AM.