S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

why did Honda discontinue the S2000?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-22-2013 | 12:17 PM
  #11  
s2000maniac's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by rob-2
4. It was never intended to be an addition to their line - it was in fact to be a short run 50th car.
^^ this!

Honda wanted to show the world what it can do, what it was capable of....
Old 08-22-2013 | 12:39 PM
  #12  
_brandon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 602
Likes: 1
Default

Because not too many people could handle its awesomeness. S2000 owners were chosen by the divine right of God to possess such machinery. One does not simply buy it off the lot.

/End Thread
Old 08-22-2013 | 02:54 PM
  #13  
rob-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,657
Likes: 170
Default

Originally Posted by Shigun
Originally Posted by superstuddc27' timestamp='1377198646' post='22739562
[quote name='Shigun' timestamp='1377195306' post='22739427']
You're missing a few details on how supply and demand work. Honda was offering a mint S2000 for x amount, with a y amount of supply. Given that there was a continuous supply, the demand would never exponentially increase. Because the S2000 is no longer offered, they start to become rare, and demand increases.

Point in case is the Miata, which you pointed out. They are still made today, but you don't see huge demand for them (for many reasons, not just supply and demand).

As well, while Honda has "discontinued" the S2000, they haven't fully stopped with it. At the 2013 Tokyo Auto Salon, they showed the S2000 Modulo Climax, so it shows that they have been working on it, and it seems unlikely that they would really continue on with it if they had no intention of ever releasing another model. If that will make it to the USDM or not is a different matter though.
Supply and demand are independent of one another
No....supply and demand are directly related to one another. There is the law of supply and demand that explicitly states that relation and how they each effect each other.
[/quote]

No they are not.

I regularly see supply out pace demand, and the other way around in real. In economic 'theory' they are directly connected and there is the sweet spot where they both meet. Don't confuse theory with fact.
Old 08-22-2013 | 04:46 PM
  #14  
caraficionado's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shigun
Originally Posted by superstuddc27' timestamp='1377198646' post='22739562
[quote name='Shigun' timestamp='1377195306' post='22739427']
You're missing a few details on how supply and demand work. Honda was offering a mint S2000 for x amount, with a y amount of supply. Given that there was a continuous supply, the demand would never exponentially increase. Because the S2000 is no longer offered, they start to become rare, and demand increases.

Point in case is the Miata, which you pointed out. They are still made today, but you don't see huge demand for them (for many reasons, not just supply and demand).

As well, while Honda has "discontinued" the S2000, they haven't fully stopped with it. At the 2013 Tokyo Auto Salon, they showed the S2000 Modulo Climax, so it shows that they have been working on it, and it seems unlikely that they would really continue on with it if they had no intention of ever releasing another model. If that will make it to the USDM or not is a different matter though.
Supply and demand are independent of one another
No....supply and demand are directly related to one another. There is the law of supply and demand that explicitly states that relation and how they each effect each other.
[/quote]
The law states how Z prices change given X demand and Y supply. Demand doesn't drive supply and vice versa - there is no direct relationship here.

The four basic laws of supply and demand are:[1]

If demand increases and supply remains unchanged, a shortage occurs, leading to a higher equilibrium price.
If demand decreases and supply remains unchanged, a surplus occurs, leading to a lower equilibrium price.
If demand remains unchanged and supply increases, a surplus occurs, leading to a lower equilibrium price.
If demand remains unchanged and supply decreases, a shortage occurs, leading to a higher equilibrium price.

Read more/Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand
Old 08-22-2013 | 05:33 PM
  #15  
abroke1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: mid west
Default

This topic is not something that cannot be answered.....it has been answered a dozen times so far.
Real answer is by 2009 there were not enough people willing to plunk down that much moola for an s2k.
Sales numbers were ridiculously low.
it really ain't too pretty much practical ya know. but we don't care about that. owners know it is a great car and we are lucky to have one.
Old 08-22-2013 | 05:49 PM
  #16  
Shigun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by caraficionado
The law states how Z prices change given X demand and Y supply. Demand doesn't drive supply and vice versa - there is no direct relationship here.

The four basic laws of supply and demand are:[1]

If demand increases and supply remains unchanged, a shortage occurs, leading to a higher equilibrium price.
If demand decreases and supply remains unchanged, a surplus occurs, leading to a lower equilibrium price.
If demand remains unchanged and supply increases, a surplus occurs, leading to a lower equilibrium price.
If demand remains unchanged and supply decreases, a shortage occurs, leading to a higher equilibrium price.

Read more/Source: http://en.wikipedia....pply_and_demand
You're referring to a basis of supply and demand in regards to pricing, which is irrelevant in this case. Supply and demand are directly related. If demand is high, it would (theoretically) make sense for an increase supply, and vice versa, if demand is low, it would make sense for a decrease in supply. OP made the statement that simply because there was a high price for the car, there was a high demand, which is not true. A high price and a high demand are not directly, explicitly, correlated.
Old 08-22-2013 | 06:17 PM
  #17  
BlakeNFR's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: South Orange County
Default

Just because you know supply and demand, as well as fiscal and monetary policies, doesn't make you an economist.

if this is true, then I'm a qualify gynecologist..
Old 08-22-2013 | 07:35 PM
  #18  
darcyw's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 359
From: um, a house
Default

Originally Posted by _brandon
Because not too many people could handle its awesomeness. S2000 owners were chosen by the divine right of God to possess such machinery. One does not simply buy it off the lot.

/End Thread
i thought that was Ferrari's sales mantra.

darcy
Old 08-22-2013 | 07:43 PM
  #19  
RMurphy's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,659
Likes: 207
From: West Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by abroke1
This topic is not something that cannot be answered.....it has been answered a dozen times so far.
Great. Then we can stop discussing it since it's been answered ad nauseum.
Old 08-23-2013 | 02:44 AM
  #20  
Lil Dre's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Default

Lol, Rmurphy is harsh bro


Quick Reply: why did Honda discontinue the S2000?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:29 PM.