S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Wheel size and performance

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-09-2002 | 02:38 PM
  #1  
jimk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: bismarck
Default Wheel size and performance

Do larger wheels always pose a performance loss even when the overall diameter and weight are equivalent???
Old 04-09-2002 | 02:43 PM
  #2  
s2oooboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Default

I think what u gain in cornering ablility/feel....you lose in top speed and acceleration....

I think Phantom should chime in for this one.....I beleive he said with his Volk TE37s (18s)....he loses about half a car length to stock S2000's.
Old 04-09-2002 | 02:55 PM
  #3  
SuzukaBlueAP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: F20C/AP1
Default

you will definitely be more stable of handling with bigger size of wheels.

like what s2oooboy said, it will slow you down in top speed and acceleration.

also sometime too stable will make your car become more understeer.


if the size of wheel is overly larger (19in, 20in...) then it will make the car less nimble instead of improve handling. also use more fuel, create error of speedmeter reading...
Old 04-09-2002 | 02:56 PM
  #4  
socal28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles (SFV)
Default

It mostly depends on weight too.
Even with my semi-light 18", the tires are larger which weighs alot more than stock. I gained a mere 3 lbs more per corner going with 18s setup.
I can definitely feel a slight degrade in acceleration and straight line performance.
I think light 17" wheels with 215 front and 245 rear is the best overall setup.
Old 04-09-2002 | 03:24 PM
  #5  
Phantom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Originally posted by s2oooboy
I think what u gain in cornering ablility/feel....you lose in top speed and acceleration....

I think Phantom should chime in for this one.....I beleive he said with his Volk TE37s (18s)....he loses about half a car length to stock S2000's.
s2oooboy,

Heh heh...when I was running my 18x8.5 Volks in rear with Toyo T1-S 245/35/18...I was loosing at least 3/4 a car length on the launch to a stock S2000. The total weight of the Volk 18 and tire was less than the stock wheel and tire. The loss was due to:

1. The T1-S tire isn't as sticky.
2. The 245/35/18 T1-S tread width is less than stock.
3. The T1-S has larger water channels (less contact patch design).
Old 04-09-2002 | 03:32 PM
  #6  
s2oooboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Phantom
[B]

The loss was due to:
Old 04-09-2002 | 03:55 PM
  #7  
Phantom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Originally posted by jimk
Do larger wheels always pose a performance loss even when the overall diameter and weight are equivalent???
You really can't compare the stock wheel and tire to an aftermarket wheel and tire setup because the stock S02's are designed for the S2000. Basically, it is hard to find an aftermarket wheel and street tire for the s2000 where you will not loose performance.

If you want to go aftermarket...I will recommend some lightweight 17's.
socal28 is on the right track. 215/45/17 and 245/40/17 is the way to go.

Trending Topics

Old 04-09-2002 | 04:10 PM
  #8  
Phantom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Originally posted by s2oooboy


So are u trying to say that u could make up that difference by getting a stickier compound tire, larger tread width, and larger contact patch design?

I would think that the more tire is on the ground, the harder the engine has to work to move that much more rubber....coefficient of friction would be greater.

I think it has more to do with rotational inertia....why do u think F1 cars have 13 inch rims?....less rotational inertia....just my opinion
I'm saying that I lost to a stock S2000 because the coeficient of friction with the 245/35/18 T1-S is less than the stock 225/50/16 S02. I lost 3/4 a car length during the launching of our cars (when our tires were spinning). Simply put, my tires did not grip as well. But, for the rest of the race I stayed consistantly 3/4 car length behind the stock S2000.

It wasn't because of driver error because we did the race 5 times with my 18's. I either tie or beat this driver with my stock wheels.
Old 04-09-2002 | 04:16 PM
  #9  
Russ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 0
From: Land of the landeaus
Default

I've done exhaustive research on this topic and after a few years, have finally settled on a 2.5x factor for tire/wheel weight differences. Over the course of three years, in several forums featuring highly educated enthusiasts whose degrees are in physics, that figure seems to be most consistent. I've read in other forums adjusted #'s as high as 10x and that is simply ridiculous. To sum it up, for every 1-lb of "rolling" weight gained per tire/wheel or combination of the above, it is equal to 2.5-lbs of static weight. I weighed my OEM combination of tire/wheel before changing over and came to 43 and 41-lbs (rear/front) respectively. My 18/17-inch combo (rear/front) only increased to 46 and 43-lbs respectively and this slight increase was due more to tire weight savings (less sidewall and less contact patch). Total weight according to my above formula is 10x2.5=25-lbs.
Using another formula of mine which reads:
10-lbs of weight = .0023 performance difference in 1/4 mile (all other factors being equal), then the weight gained from my tire/wheel combo would normally result in a gain in the 1/4 of .06 seconds.
FWIW, another formula to convert HP from time is: time/ .023 = hp
so .06/.023 = 2.6hp or roughly 3hp lost from the newbie tire/wheel combo.

All of these formulas have worked for me going on two decades now and are backed up with more than 100 accelerometer runs over the past three years with five different vehicles. Not entirely scientific to the nth degree, but pretty darn accurate for my own purposes. My recent acceleration tests done with the suzuka revealed a loss of performance wholly in line with my projections (about 3hp) following the tire/wheel switchover. The stock wheels are quite heavy actually, at least for a 16-inch size.
I make no assertions of the affect tire track, contact patch, tread compound or other factors (beyond weight) might have in these formulas , but for straight line acceleration (I don't address handling variances) , you're not going to lose too much performance in say, the 1/4-mile going from an 18-lb wheel to a 21-lb wheel but I have noticed some owners who have purchased aftermarket wheels that are as heavy as 28-lbs each. On wheel weight alone, that is akin to adding a small passenger to your vehicle (10 x 4 x 2.5 = 100-lbs) and the performance variance definitely will/can be felt and noted.
Old 04-09-2002 | 04:39 PM
  #10  
s2oooboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Phantom
[B]

I'm saying that I lost to a stock S2000 because the coeficient of friction with the 245/35/18 T1-S is less than the stock 225/50/16 S02.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 AM.