S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

V8 Powered S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-22-2010, 09:28 PM
  #441  
Registered User
 
unethikl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what's there to fuss about.. he has the papers to prove it.
Other than that, now we all need to make it drop to 2500 at least!!
Old 04-23-2010, 03:46 AM
  #442  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbosix,Apr 22 2010, 08:41 PM
cat states they're within .1% at 80,000lbs.
That's +/- 80 lb.

my sub 3000lb car ends up not only weighing pretty much right where one would expect a stock ap1 minus heavy spare and toolkit, but also within 20lbs F/R distribution
I would expect an S2k minus the spare and toolkit (surely no more than 40 lb.) with a full tank of fuel (~80 lb.) to weigh ~2790 lb based on published "as-tested" AP1 weights and what my own AP1 weighed in at at the track scales.

with 20lbs being the actual resolution of the scales,
The minimum displayed weight increment does not tell you what the actual resolution is.

sure... you might not be actively "disputing anything" but you're hinting that my numbers are wrong when they fall in line close to whats expected.
Just pointing out that truck scales for weighing tractor trailers is not *necessarily* going to give you accurate weight (within a reasonable tolerance, say +/- 5 lb.) for a ~2800 lb. car.

2740 lb. for your car wouldn't totally surprise me, but I'd have more *confidence* in that number if it came from scales designed for and calibrated for weighing things more in the 5000 lb. range than in the 80,000 lb. range.
Old 04-23-2010, 04:37 AM
  #443  
Registered User

 
Rodney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC burbs
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Apr 23 2010, 07:46 AM
Just pointing out that truck scales for weighing tractor trailers is not *necessarily* going to give you accurate weight (within a reasonable tolerance, say +/- 5 lb.) for a ~2800 lb. car.
i was a licensed scalemaster for over 10 years. as per state law, we had to have the scaled recertified every few years. i was 198lbs at the time, and it always read 200 when i was on the scales, no matter where i was, and we had 2 70' scales. ours read in 20lb increments, and you can set it for whatever you want. if you went with less, wind had a major effect on the scales, and it would never settle down.
Old 04-23-2010, 11:46 PM
  #444  

 
turbosix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: dfw
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Rodney,Apr 23 2010, 06:37 AM
i was a licensed scalemaster for over 10 years. as per state law, we had to have the scaled recertified every few years. i was 198lbs at the time, and it always read 200 when i was on the scales, no matter where i was, and we had 2 70' scales. ours read in 20lb increments, and you can set it for whatever you want. if you went with less, wind had a major effect on the scales, and it would never settle down.
very good info, thanks rodney!
Old 04-24-2010, 03:47 AM
  #445  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rodney,Apr 23 2010, 04:37 AM
i was a licensed scalemaster for over 10 years. as per state law, we had to have the scaled recertified every few years. i was 198lbs at the time, and it always read 200 when i was on the scales, no matter where i was, and we had 2 70' scales. ours read in 20lb increments, and you can set it for whatever you want. if you went with less, wind had a major effect on the scales, and it would never settle down.
This in no way proves accuracy/reliability of truck scales at a 200 lb. load.

Again, I'm not saying I think the 2740 lb. reading is *wrong*, only that scales for measuring 80,000 lb. weight are going to have a greater +/- range of error.

Nominally, the average error will be zero, but the RANGE of possible error on a 18-wheeler truck scale is going to be on the order of 10 times greater than the error (in the same units of weight) on a car scale. If a car scale may be off by pounds, a truck scale may be off by tens of pounds.
Old 04-24-2010, 06:59 AM
  #446  

 
camuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 8,041
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

not for nothing, my ap2 with full tank of gas and a full system-amp,sub, etc minus the spare weighted 2800 on the scale at the race track.

Old 04-24-2010, 07:19 AM
  #447  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

My '01 must be unusually heavy...
Old 04-24-2010, 07:55 AM
  #448  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
xyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atl.
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Apr 24 2010, 07:19 AM
My '01 must be unusually heavy...
Dan if you read my earlier post the buddy of mine that had his car weighed was on corner balance scales and not on a truck scale and it came in at 2714 so i would say that the truck scales are pretty damn close now if you all would like to continue this discusion start your own damn thread and stop jacking this one

And if you car does weigh more than this, then yes your car is unusually heavy.

Thanks for the post Turbosix the proof is in the writing, dont know whats so hard to understand there.
Old 04-24-2010, 08:36 AM
  #449  
Registered User

 
sirbunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Just an FYI on S2k weights, with the same wheels/tires, fluid levels, exhaust, and an account for soft top, rear window, a/c ... all S2000 will be roughly the same weight. Early S2000s don't magically weigh less. The difference in wheels/tires, exhaust and rear window prove this. You also need to do the comparisons on the same scales, same time, etc. No different than comparing dyno charts. I have done this numerous times for stock class auto-x purposes.

I would find another S2000 owner to go with you next time. For proper comparison, make note of any changes and top that fuel tank off. Don't just speculate and assume all scales are equal. I have seen large variances. Your AP1 isn't unusually heavy unless there is something unaccounted for. That type of talk is nonsense and without a factual base. Multiple S2000s, same scale, same day or its not worth worrying about.

-Marc
Old 04-24-2010, 12:39 PM
  #450  
Registered User

 
Pabs626's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice keep us updated


Quick Reply: V8 Powered S2000



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 PM.