S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Stabilty Control Retrofit Possible from AP2?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-25-2009 | 11:28 AM
  #11  
dammitjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 15
From: WI
Default

Awesome. It should work with an AEM EmS, correct?
Old 10-25-2009 | 11:39 AM
  #12  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,730
Likes: 8
Default

Yup. We started out with OEM ECU and it still works now that we're AEM EMS'd.
Old 10-25-2009 | 01:18 PM
  #13  
zhp43867's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Oct 25 2009, 11:12 AM
Even though the OP said "stability control" I took it to mean any type of aid that would help increase confidence in Winter.

I think that the RLTC would serve that purpose very well. Especially with snow tires. I was very impressed. That being said, the AP1 sits in the trailer now and the DBW AP2 is on daily driver duty. From this past weekend's snow, DBW S2K on Nokians + LFB to reduce off-throttle oversteer >> Our Q7 on all-seasons.
Exactly. So it seems like if I can swing for AP2 it would be safer in the winter but Race Logic is 90% there... Also what else makes the AP2 less twitchy? Steering rack and alignment?
Old 10-25-2009 | 01:23 PM
  #14  
dammitjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 15
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by zhp43867,Oct 25 2009, 04:18 PM
Race Logic is 90% there
Well, IMHO stability control is more than a 10% improvement over traction control. If you're concerned about it get an 06+ if possible.
Old 10-25-2009 | 02:50 PM
  #15  
suzukawoods's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Default

My understanding is that the stability control system requires a whole bunch of parts/sensors. I have not yet come across any add-on, plug-and-play products.....
Old 10-25-2009 | 02:55 PM
  #16  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,730
Likes: 8
Default

But a decent driver may never hit that hairy 10% that VSA would have spared a ham fisted driver from.

I'd rather have an AP1 on snow tires and without traction control than an 06 AP2 on all seasons (because the newer car ate up the tire budget).
Old 10-25-2009 | 03:36 PM
  #17  
dammitjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 15
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Oct 25 2009, 05:55 PM
a decent driver
I don't buy the decent driver VSA argument. No one is on top of their game 100% of the time on the street, and there are tons of variables with the other yahoos out there.
Old 10-25-2009 | 04:39 PM
  #18  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,730
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by 9volt,Oct 25 2009, 03:36 PM
I don't buy the decent driver VSA argument. No one is on top of their game 100% of the time on the street, and there are tons of variables with the other yahoos out there.
I agree with you.

I think TC / VSA is very useful, even if you're a good driver.

What I was saying is:

The times during Winter (assuming snow) that TC is helpful. You're rolling on the throttle gently on a left-hand, off-camber turn. There's a patch of slush hidden beneath the surface snow. As you crest the center ridge, the weight offloads from the rear at the same time you hit the slush. You were driving 10mph under the level of grip for the regular snow, but the combination of the weight transfer and the unseen slush causes the rear to break free. You were mid-turn and with the slush, you were only 5mph over the speed in which you'd regain grip.

Scenario #1: No TC, good driver. You realize that the rears have broken through (the rpms shot 2000 past where they needed to be) and your reaction is good enough to save it. You steadied the throttle without lifting too much or gassing too much. Car wiggles a little.

Scenario #2: TC, good driver. The little patch of slush goes basically unnoticed. The TC prevented the rears from revving past the point of regaining grip when you hit the slush. Your car was pointed in the correct direction to start with and you weren't driving too fast for conditions (except for the patch of slush... which you couldn't see).

Scenario #3: VSA, inexperienced driver. Came in too hot. Wasn't on the right line. Pulls the wheel over and the car starts plowing forward. VSA kicks in and helps reorient the car.

So while VSA can do things that TC cannot, I think a good driver won't necessarily need the added functionality of VSA over TC.

That was the point I was making. That VSA can do a lot of things... but a good driver may never need more than basic Traction Control (which I think is immensely helpful in low-traction conditions).
Old 10-25-2009 | 04:58 PM
  #19  
ahrmike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Default

If youre not expecting a spin, at 2am while driving normally and unexpectedly hitting a slippery patch of road, you gotta be some kind of god to have the proper reaction in a split second.
Old 10-25-2009 | 05:50 PM
  #20  
zhp43867's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Default

I'm not a godly driver. I don't have that much experience spinning out and correcting it.

I will be taking winter driving courses and going to HDPE's soon but like one of the previous posters said thats not going to save me all the time.


Quick Reply: Stabilty Control Retrofit Possible from AP2?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:26 PM.