Well I'd advise you all not to park in that parking lot

 

How do you figure? It looks like your standard 3/4 head-on to me.

 

See what I mean about them darn silver cars, their trying so hard to be red this is what happens. They were probally racing to the dealer to get it repainted RED and bang you can see the rest!!!

 

There goes the insurance rates again!

 

Looks to be more than a 3/4 head-on. . .in the second pic, look at the rear wheel. My guess would be a counter clock-wise spin that resulted in a front/front quarter meeting with a guard rail or concrete barrier.

Maybe because of the picture, but I don't see any transferance of paint from another car to the S2K. I do see road rashed body panels, that how I inferred that the car met a barrier of some sort. The rear breaking the way it did looks like the car had some sort of lateral movement. I think the car was spinning counter clockwise because of the lateral movement and the passenger side front meeting with an object, whereas if the car spun clockwise, the damage should be more towards the driver's side.

This is just my guess, I am no expert, detective or otherwise. . .I kinda just want to see how on or off the mark I am.

Urmil
Luder94

 

Shut your traps fellas, where is your brotherhood? Let us have a moment of silence for the poor chap...it could have been ANY ONE OF US. *Bows his head and prays to the God of the Stook... Have mercy oh Lord. On a side note, it makes my Silver beauty look even better...hehe.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luder94:
[B]Looks to be more than a 3/4 head-on. . .in the second pic, look at the rear wheel.

 

Now there's a sexist statement, a woman could have done that. In fact my wife has had similar success with a few vehicles.

 

Not mine.

Must be a '00 model. No front tab stickers are required in Washington after the first of the year.

 

Not Me .
But a few Silver one's live in the area.
Can anyone read the dealer lic. plate
protecter.? Dealership ?