S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Snap oversteer

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-18-2010, 05:07 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
jela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SPOON SPORTS S2000
the S could be dangerous if you don't know your car
Old 01-18-2010, 05:08 PM
  #52  
Registered User

 
GiffS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Inverloch, Victoria
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Jan 18 2010, 08:38 AM
The AP2 fixed the rear bumpsteer issue, while still maintaining enough rear roll stiffness bias to be fairly neutral at the limit, but even that is too much for many drivers who've been brought up driving cars designed to resolutely understeer at the limit.
So can we retrofit the AP2 rear end?
Old 01-18-2010, 05:20 PM
  #53  
Registered User

 
dammitjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Old 01-18-2010, 11:26 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
clag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sukeetoshyoo88,Jan 18 2010, 05:29 PM
So, win the bump toe change in the rear. Is there a way to change that? So that there is no toe change in the rear with bump?

I'M guessing that simply changing to coil overs is not gonna do the trick right?
With a dedicated AP1 track car I imagine you could dial in a healthy measure of toe-in, then even with decompression of the rear under braking/throttle-lift you would not be faced with a truckload of toe-out. This would cause a lot of straight-line scrub, impacting acceleration, as well as eating away at the rear tires on a daily driver which makes it a bit impractical for those who track rarely.

Also, if part swapping is in your budget, as CKit suggested:
As a general note: with stiffer springs and more rear rebound damping, forward weight transfer under lift can be drastically reduced.
Neither will prevent the toe change, perhaps make it less dramatic. Just thoughts.
Old 01-19-2010, 03:53 AM
  #55  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sukeetoshyoo88,Jan 18 2010, 05:29 PM
So, win the bump toe change in the rear. Is there a way to change that? So that there is no toe change in the rear with bump?

I'M guessing that simply changing to coil overs is not gonna do the trick right?
Going to stiffer springs/dampers will reduce the toe change inasmuch as it reduces suspension travel. I dunno exactly what the rear toe curve is, but if you increased spring and damping rates by 50%, the range of toe change under a given set of driving conditions should be reduced by about 1/3.

Even with the stock suspension, once you get used to the sort of nonlinear handling of the car (initial oversteer followed by neutrality), it's not so bad, really.
Old 01-19-2010, 03:55 AM
  #56  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gifftech,Jan 18 2010, 06:08 PM
So can we retrofit the AP2 rear end?
I think the difference is in the location of the rear toe arm inner pivot. I.e., you'd have to swap in an AP2 rear subframe. Or you could try to relocate the pivot in the AP1's chassis. Honestly, I think seat time at the limit (autox or HPDE) is much better investment.

There are "bump-steer" kits for the AP1 that replace the toe arms, but some of these have suffered failures in use. I'm a big fan of keeping primary structural components OEM...
Old 01-19-2010, 04:15 AM
  #57  

 
bronxbomber252's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,829
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hecash,Jan 19 2010, 04:29 AM
My AP1 was pretty much a "track car." This is the Toe alignment setting that I settled on after about 2 years of testing.

Front
Toe -0.03 in /-0.04 in
Total Toe -0.07 in

Rear
Toe 0.09 in /0.10 in
Total Toe 0.19 in

It will take several hundred miles on the street or highway to screw up your tires but they will be screwed up.
I run a lot of toe in (1/4in) due to doing a lot of autox on my 01... It is also my daily driver and Although I will say I probably have quicker tire wear my tires never got screwed up in any way. with 1/4in toe in and -2.5deg camber in the rear, no toe in the front and -1.6deg camber front I have perfectly even tire wear after 1 or 2 autox's a month and 1000-1500 (sometimes more) street miles a month.
Old 01-19-2010, 04:24 AM
  #58  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=clag,Jan 19 2010, 12:26 AM]With a dedicated AP1 track car I imagine you could dial in a healthy measure of toe-in, then even with decompression of the rear under braking/throttle-lift you would not be faced with a truckload of toe-out.
Old 01-19-2010, 10:29 AM
  #59  
Registered User
 
clag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=ZDan,Jan 19 2010, 05:24 AM]IMO the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
Old 01-19-2010, 10:43 AM
  #60  
Former Moderator

 
CKit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,730
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=ZDan,Jan 19 2010, 05:24 AM] Forward weight transfer under lift is going to be exactly the same under a given rate of deceleration, regardless of what spring and damping rates are.


Quick Reply: Snap oversteer



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:29 AM.