smaller radiator
10-12-2007, 05:42 AM
#11
Originally Posted by tbaker,Oct 12 2007, 03:00 AM
Do some research on throttle bodies. Noone on this board uses them because they don't add power on the s2k. The honda engineers knew what they were doing when they designed the intake system.
10-12-2007, 06:18 AM
#12
Moderator
Originally Posted by dmw16,Oct 11 2007, 07:52 AM
This might be one of the worst ideas I've ever heard of. Everything we've seen shows that an intake makes little to know performance improvement in the car. But you want to remove your radiator, get a SMALLER one, so you can make some sort of custom "ram-air" (which is pretty much bull$hit) intake?
Do yourself a favor, leave the radiator alone and get a K&N.
Do yourself a favor, leave the radiator alone and get a K&N.
The airbox system of the S2000 is not that great imo - it sits behind the radiator and fan and at he top of the engine, so a smaller efficient radiator on the passenger side would allow a direct line from the intake to the front of the car, thus allowing a nice straight pipe from the nose, not behind a radiator, into the engine - fresh air without all the bends of your typical AEM style intake.
With the stock radiator, the stock air box is probably the best design for an intake imo, but I see nothing wrong with getting a direct pipe into the engine by utilizing a less wide radiator.
10-12-2007, 06:41 AM
#13
Registered User
as long as the radiator has the capacity to handle the heat produced by the engine, it should be fine. A perfect example of this is the cwest carbon time attack car. They have a narrower radiator for the ram air effect with their scoop, however the radiator is thicker.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
s2konroids
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
7
04-10-2009 11:42 AM