SC s2000 diss
#1
SC s2000 diss
#3
I'm guessing you mean SC is supercharger right? I didnt read the forum cause its no biggie we all know which is the better sports car. Let them be jealous, many WRX owners upgrade to the s2k anyways.
#4
The WRX may be a very capable car, but it just plain isn't fun to drive. IMO the "fun" all comes before 35mph. Friends argue that it is still fun up to 60, but all in all, the car is a bit boring. It definitely feels it's size as well...something that I don't like in most cars.
#7
We don't need to bag on their cars. We know what our cars are, and that's all that really matters because we're the one's driving it, not them. So let them be childish and bag on whatever they want, but let's not sink to their level, show some character.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by HelloEvo,Jul 10 2005, 04:11 PM
We don't need to bag on their cars. We know what our cars are, and that's all that really matters because we're the one's driving it, not them. So let them be childish and bag on whatever they want, but let's not sink to their level, show some character.
#9
i've driven both supercharged and turbocharged s2000's in the past. i would have to say that i was somewhat dissapointed with the power delivery of the s/c compared to the turbo. i can see how a s/c s2000 would lose to some of those cars from a roll due to the linear power delivery.
#10
I'm not sure if this is "bagging" on a car, but the WRX, although mildly interesting, is basically a pimped sedan. Personally I also outgrew that stuff long, long ago.
However, anybody who wants it is welcome to it ...
However, anybody who wants it is welcome to it ...