View Poll Results: Do you think this article belongs on the front page?
Voters: 207. You may not vote on this poll
"S2k is better then the Evo" - Is this Necessary?
03-13-2006, 08:22 PM
#95
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maaan, this is weak. Juss ones man opinion, can rile up soo many people in the wrong way. I don't understand why people have to get all crazy about something thats juss soo orindary to the human eye. "Oh my god, the s2k is better then the EVO" its the end of the world!!!**sarcastically** You guys are fabricating such a simple opinion and blowing it way out of the water. Its the same thing as if i was to say " A nissan hardbody pickup is better than a ford ranger" omg, whas gonna happen now, is there gonna be a wild discussion about this also? Build a bridge, get over it. Juss let the man speak. Each person has their own opinion to voice whats what.
03-13-2006, 08:26 PM
#96
Registered User
I had an STI, and while it was decent car it in no way made driving as fun as the s2k.
That said, I think the article on the front page is poorly thought out and designed to stir up a bunch of BS. Frankly, I don't care that the STI or EVO was based/shares/looks even remotely like the an econobox. They are fast as hell, handle damn well, and a versital. The S2k is a little better in the PROFESSIONAL stock AutoX. Yeah us.
The guy who wrote it must have spent hours digging through the SRT4 forums to pull that garbage together.
Admittedly their is plenty of dumbass statements about the s2k on Evo forums, but NO ONE has ever been dumb enough to put them on the front page of their website.
The article should be pulled.
That said, I think the article on the front page is poorly thought out and designed to stir up a bunch of BS. Frankly, I don't care that the STI or EVO was based/shares/looks even remotely like the an econobox. They are fast as hell, handle damn well, and a versital. The S2k is a little better in the PROFESSIONAL stock AutoX. Yeah us.
The guy who wrote it must have spent hours digging through the SRT4 forums to pull that garbage together.
Admittedly their is plenty of dumbass statements about the s2k on Evo forums, but NO ONE has ever been dumb enough to put them on the front page of their website.
The article should be pulled.
03-13-2006, 08:26 PM
#97
I agree with those saying that an article like this is okay on the forums but not on the front page. On the front page, it represents the opinions of all of us here. Now, I'm not a paying member, but I would hope that s2ki understands that a large number of us do not want to be associated with the article. There's no need for it.
How about an article that lists the pros of our car in its own light rather than putting down an extremely different car?
How about an article that lists the pros of our car in its own light rather than putting down an extremely different car?
03-13-2006, 08:27 PM
#98
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wheeling Illinois
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I currently own an 03 S2000, and an 04 Evo. I am selling my S2000 because the Evo is more practical here in chicago and my money goes further in the Evo then it does in the S.
The S is hands down a more stunning looking car.
This should'nt be a pissing match on what car is better. Are we not older than this?
The S is hands down a more stunning looking car.
This should'nt be a pissing match on what car is better. Are we not older than this?
03-13-2006, 08:37 PM
#100
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Irvine
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Mar 13 2006, 05:32 PM
I think its a stupid atricle, with nothing but 10000% riceboy logic. Its an embarassment to have on the front page of the forum.