S2000 At a Glance chart by ROAD & TRACK
10-23-2002, 01:28 PM
#11
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ahh..okay. I saw the American Honda Co Inc and figured it was an US spec. Now I see the tested in Japan logo on there.
And on that subject why was the ratio changed for US? Was it an emissions thing?
And on that subject why was the ratio changed for US? Was it an emissions thing?
10-23-2002, 01:35 PM
#12
our 93/91 octane can't handle 11.7:11 compression...
10-23-2002, 03:04 PM
#15
Some 0 to 60 times:
5.2 seconds (Motor Trend, Feb
5.2 seconds (Motor Trend, Feb
10-23-2002, 04:18 PM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Porsche951
[B]Road &Track did a comparison a short time later. The S2000 was pared up against an "M" Roadster and a Porsche Boxster. The Honda won the comparison test
[B]Road &Track did a comparison a short time later. The S2000 was pared up against an "M" Roadster and a Porsche Boxster. The Honda won the comparison test
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vtecing
Florida S2000 Owners
0
05-23-2002 10:15 AM
vtecing
S2000 Racing and Competition
0
05-23-2002 09:26 AM
vtecing
Carolinas
0
05-23-2002 09:21 AM
S2000 Driver
S2000 Talk
16
03-12-2001 06:47 PM