S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 at altitude sucks...

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-28-2002 | 08:19 PM
  #1  
steve c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default S2000 at altitude sucks...

Drove the S2000 from Seattle to Denver on Sunday / Monday -- 22 hours straight through the night (3 hour nap somewhere around Mountain Home Idaho). Hell.
Interesting observations:

1. VTEC is felt later in the RPM range than before.
2. The car has zero torque, at sea level it was bad, up here it's terrible.
3. Less sound (duh).

Overall I am left with the impression that cars like the S2000 which require high revs and have low torque are not meant for 5200 feet of elevation.

Altitude.

My wife however is happy, she has a convertible to drive around town.
Old 08-28-2002 | 08:32 PM
  #2  
FormerH22a4's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 2
From: Calgary
Default

that is with any NA car. The altitude really hits them hard. If you think that is bad, try driving with the A/C on in addition to the high elevation. Vtec still has kick though
Old 08-28-2002 | 09:25 PM
  #3  
Thoe99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

time for a turbo or supercharger...
Old 08-28-2002 | 09:32 PM
  #4  
RedHead's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Default

I would pick the S4 or WRX over the S2000 if I were to live in Denver.
Old 08-28-2002 | 10:21 PM
  #5  
bash's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Littleton
Default

Hmm, I'm loving my S2K mile high and it ran great going up Mount Evans last weekend (highest paved road in the U.S.). Perhaps it has more to do with the ECU taking several days to adjust to the change in air density. VTEC does seem to be later than others who post. Mine usually kicks in about 6500.
Old 08-28-2002 | 10:38 PM
  #6  
stockae92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

so now you want to race uphill too?
Old 08-28-2002 | 11:38 PM
  #7  
Kwando's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
From: Aurora
Default

hey steve c since you back in town, maybe you can join us for a drive on Sept 8.
Old 08-29-2002 | 02:17 PM
  #8  
steve c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

Mine usually kicks in about 6500.
Exactly. Odd eh?

Sept 8 drive sounds like a blast
Old 08-29-2002 | 03:20 PM
  #9  
Hobb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: West Hartford
Default

If you look in the owners manual I beleive it says that at altitude the s2000 might need to have a fuel mixture adjustment. At work or I would find the page.


Hobb
Old 08-29-2002 | 04:01 PM
  #10  
Gantra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: La Jolla
Default

What you are talking about is the way all normally aspirated engines perform as altitude increases. This is the same phenomena that small piston powered aircraft experience -- the higher they fly the the lower the performance of the engine. A way to counter this is to use a turbocharger, which higher end private planes have. This allows such aircraft to fly in the 20-25000 ft. range rather than the sub 20s range for normally aspirated aircraft.

Air density decreases as elevation increases and so the available oxygen decreases and the engine produces less power.


Quick Reply: S2000 at altitude sucks...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 AM.