S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

is the S the only car to ONLY come in manual?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-19-2010, 08:29 PM
  #21  

 
Presto123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Miramar, FloriDUH
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mar48,Jul 19 2010, 08:17 PM
eh? .... SMG isn't manual
The pre bangle m5s were manual only. I believe they ran til 2002 or 2003.
Old 07-19-2010, 09:04 PM
  #22  

 
JDM_JOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Jul 19 2010, 07:31 PM
I respectfully disagree. Once you introduce a lot of options and make the car an "everyman's" type car, it begins to lose some of it's identity and becomes less special.

I hate to sound elitist, but a car like the S2000 isn't and shouldn't be meant for everyone. That's part of what makes it so very special.

By the way, all of the great English sportscars of the 40s, 50s and 60s were also very limited in options. You bought them the way they came, or you didn't buy them. It wasn't until the 70s, when they were desperate for market share, that they started to introduce options and automatic transmissions. Had they focused on updating the cars and quality control, they probably wouldn't have found themselves in that situation. The S2000 is what the MGB should have become.
I understand exactly what you mean. But I guess I was thinking more along the lines of a coupe version as I would not really care about different trim level interior wise.

With that being said the S2000 was based off the S500, S600, and S800. Then why not give us a coupe version just like the S600 and S800's had?
Old 07-19-2010, 09:04 PM
  #23  
Registered User

 
tntrac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: los angeles
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by R3DS2K,Jul 19 2010, 04:59 PM
z06

It looks like the other corvettes, so it doesn't count
Old 07-20-2010, 02:57 AM
  #24  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,708
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDM_JOE,Jul 20 2010, 12:04 AM
I understand exactly what you mean. But I guess I was thinking more along the lines of a coupe version as I would not really care about different trim level interior wise.

With that being said the S2000 was based off the S500, S600, and S800. Then why not give us a coupe version just like the S600 and S800's had?
I suppose there are two good reasons. First of all, Honda probably thought they could accomplish having a coupe simply by making the removable hard top available, and second, they probably didn't want to invest in the r & d, design and inventory for such a limited production model.

I think the design and engineering of this car was very focused, and the engineers at Honda produced exactly the car they wanted to produce.
Old 07-20-2010, 05:12 AM
  #25  
Registered User

 
JLUDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Culpeper Virginia
Posts: 2,648
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Were MX-5's (Miata) offered as an automatic? I've never seen an automatic Miata.
Old 07-20-2010, 05:18 AM
  #26  
Moderator
Moderator
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,992
Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

I look at Mazda and the MX-5 and wonder what could have been with Honda. The S2000 filled a void in the car market that is now empty - there is nothing between an MX-5 and a Boxster/Z4 on the market (the 370Z doesn't count) - Honda really had the market all to itself for a light sportscar that could slot between these two icons, and Honda abandoned it.

The reason there were no variants of the S2000 is because the S2000 was never destined to be a regular Honda. It was originally introduced as a one-off oddity and it hung around for a bit (10 years vs the 1 it was originally to be made for). If Honda had backed it we could have seen a coupe, HT convertible, etc. The S2000 was never built with that in mind however - the reason it didn't have an auto is Honda didn't want to put the R&D into such a limited production car imo, and that's fine by me.
Old 07-20-2010, 05:47 AM
  #27  

 
Mar48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gotcha he said last decade so I figured that included all models
Old 07-20-2010, 06:17 AM
  #28  
Registered User

 
Elistan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 15,323
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

If we're going to include trim levels like ITR, Civic Si, Z06, etc., we might as well say things like "The Mazda RX-8 R3 is available in manual only" and "The Infinity G37 Coupe Sport MT is available in manual only." Which is a pretty meaningless answer IMO. Might as well say that every car with a manual option is only available with a manual if you choose that option - in other words, saying that you can't have two different transmissions, a stick-shift manual and a slushbox, in the same car.

Elise/Exige, Viper, Ford GT, Carrera GT... Probably plenty of others I just can't think of.
Old 07-20-2010, 06:20 AM
  #29  
Registered User

 
RobTheGob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=JLUDE,Jul 20 2010, 05:12 AM]Were MX-5's (Miata) offered as an automatic?
Old 07-20-2010, 06:30 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
ap1_tot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Integra Type R, Honda NSX-R, M5.


Quick Reply: is the S the only car to ONLY come in manual?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:21 AM.