The results are in... DC header dyno
09-07-2001, 12:09 PM
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sandy Springs
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shingles,
We had a dynoday recently in Atlanta (you can find the thread) and we noticed the same results on cars that had the header/intake/exhaust combo. As a matter of fact, the Injen intake caused HP to go down in consecutive runs.
I am able to confirm for you that we noticed the same spike in hp/torque at the same point before VTEC the way you did.
Just wanted to let you know.
Cheers,
We had a dynoday recently in Atlanta (you can find the thread) and we noticed the same results on cars that had the header/intake/exhaust combo. As a matter of fact, the Injen intake caused HP to go down in consecutive runs.
I am able to confirm for you that we noticed the same spike in hp/torque at the same point before VTEC the way you did.
Just wanted to let you know.
Cheers,
09-07-2001, 12:17 PM
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ZoomZoom
As a matter of fact, the Injen intake caused HP to go down in consecutive runs.
As a matter of fact, the Injen intake caused HP to go down in consecutive runs.
Wesmaster
09-07-2001, 12:41 PM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
shingles,
Thanks for the excellent report bud. Overall it was still a good buy because it is lighter and created some gains. I bet when you install a supercharger the headers will have a more benificial role in the breathing of the car.
Thanks for the excellent report bud. Overall it was still a good buy because it is lighter and created some gains. I bet when you install a supercharger the headers will have a more benificial role in the breathing of the car.
09-07-2001, 12:54 PM
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it seems like someone on here said that with the SC, there weren't a lot of additional increases that were seen with ECU and headers, I could be mistaken, but i seem to remember something like that..
09-07-2001, 01:04 PM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by cdelena
Hey, it is a beautiful piece of gear, you saved some weight, and it does not loose any power.. and we have all have evenings that cost more and were more disappointing. I'd call it a win!
Hey, it is a beautiful piece of gear, you saved some weight, and it does not loose any power.. and we have all have evenings that cost more and were more disappointing. I'd call it a win!
09-07-2001, 01:44 PM
#36
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Torrance
Posts: 8,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shing,
Talk to UL. He has a Mugen header and pretty much gets the same results. A lot of help in the mid-range, but not much anywhere else. At he last meet, I was asking him how much of a difference the header makes, he told me it only helps at the mid-range.
Talk to UL. He has a Mugen header and pretty much gets the same results. A lot of help in the mid-range, but not much anywhere else. At he last meet, I was asking him how much of a difference the header makes, he told me it only helps at the mid-range.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post