S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Quick Jack failure

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-01-2020 | 04:28 PM
  #11  
alSpeed2k's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,590
Likes: 77
From: The 604
Default

Sorry to hear about this. In for pics.
Old 05-02-2020 | 09:30 AM
  #12  
Periodoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 69
Likes: 2
From: Lafayette, Louisiana
Default

I follow directions well and assembled everything as directed. I lifted both my daughters' Foresters as well as my 86 Stang and had zero issues. Having an internal O Ring fail is not, I think, due to any assembly failures on my end.
Old 05-02-2020 | 10:45 AM
  #13  
GuthNW's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 183
From: Oregon
Default

I asked because you specifically mentioned intentionally over-tightening the factory subframe bolts of your S2000. With o-rings, over-tightening and the resulting compression set is one of the common reasons for failure. Your post caused me to look into this and actually has me questioning my own assembly procedure.
Old 05-02-2020 | 12:32 PM
  #14  
DutchyFutch's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 562
Likes: 80
From: Boston
Default

This is my worst fear of these things.
Old 05-02-2020 | 03:23 PM
  #15  
Periodoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 69
Likes: 2
From: Lafayette, Louisiana
Default

Rob Robinette, recommended spec torque plus 10%, so that's what I did.
Old 05-02-2020 | 03:25 PM
  #16  
Periodoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 69
Likes: 2
From: Lafayette, Louisiana
Default

The O-Ring failure was in the quick connect, which I did not assemble, but attached to the jack pump.
Old 05-02-2020 | 06:52 PM
  #17  
GuthNW's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 183
From: Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by Periodoc
The O-Ring failure was in the quick connect, which I did not assemble, but attached to the jack pump.
Alright, now I understand. Sorry man, that is definitely worrisome.

In your mind, were it possible to weld one additional safety lock (the metal block) in place on each of the Quick Jack frames, do you think that this might have prevented what ultimately happened to you in the case of a hydraulic failure? In other words, the cantilever arms on each side that swing freely as the car is raised would then have had one more hard stop before the car is left to drop all the way to the ground. In your case it sounds like the arms on each side would have already cleared a third (lowest) locking point so that the amount of distance the car could have dropped on the faulty side would have been limited by the additional lock point.
Old 05-03-2020 | 11:02 AM
  #18  
DutchyFutch's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 562
Likes: 80
From: Boston
Default

any pictures yet?
Old 04-17-2021 | 09:34 AM
  #19  
auric's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Default

Same happened to me. Was on my way up when one side gave. I have since "bled the system". I almost always stack tires under the car, but didint this time cause I was doing exhust work.


Old 04-29-2021 | 04:50 AM
  #20  
Ian300D's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 22
From: Aurora, CO
Default

Another gotcha I found out. Never drop as low as that picture above. My unit won't raise at all from this stance. It's like the first 1in of lift has zero strength, but rest is fine. I've not done anything to look into this though so maybe not normal.


Quick Reply: Quick Jack failure



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 AM.