S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Not Happy With My '04

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-28-2004 | 02:41 AM
  #31  
Ooalloems2koO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,912
Likes: 0
From: Rowland Heights 626
Default

well it doesnt really matter if 04 is better than 00-03 and 00-03 are better than 04
the things is HE IS NOT HAPPY in his 04 then go get 00-03?
that is what i wanna tell u
samething if u r not happy with 00-03 go get 04....
we should careless about telling good things and bad things between 00-03 and 04
all it should matter is what we like and be happy driving in it
Old 09-28-2004 | 04:34 AM
  #32  
QIKSILVR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
Default

Originally Posted by kitwetzler,Sep 28 2004, 04:09 AM
Also, get an alignment. my 04's alignment was lousy from the factory.


My alignment was also crappy, especially the rear toe, which was "in" by 2-3 deg. This made the tail very unstable at the limit.. once I got it aligned, it was a different car, handling wise.
Old 09-28-2004 | 05:18 AM
  #33  
DiamondDave2005's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,897
Likes: 1
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
Default

There's a couple of 'new' untitled '03s for sale on eBay. I noticed them last night. You could trade!
Old 09-28-2004 | 08:14 AM
  #34  
FO2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Fair Oaks
Default

Originally Posted by Unit-X,Sep 28 2004, 01:44 AM
Alot of people fish tails with the s2ks in turns not because the car handles poorly, but because most people do not understand how to drive rwd's.
I find the S2K likes to hang its tail out more than any car I've ever owned, and most of my cars have been rwd. It just seems to be the nature of the S.
Old 09-28-2004 | 09:39 AM
  #35  
WPS's Avatar
WPS
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 0
From: THEST1G
Default

Originally Posted by 124Spider,Sep 27 2004, 07:22 PM
I have read in a number of places that the '04 is a bit quicker than the previous versions. See, e.g., http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/ro...0403scc_s2000/
cliffsnotes

acceleration 04>00-03
slalom 04>00-03
skidpad 00-03>04
Old 09-28-2004 | 10:02 AM
  #36  
realdavid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Kingwood TX - Ironton OH
Default

Originally Posted by Unit-X,Sep 28 2004, 03:44 AM
Alot of people fish tails with the s2ks in turns not because the car handles poorly, but because most people do not understand how to drive rwd's.
I have never owned a front wheel drive vehicle but have had many rwd: MGA, Sunbeam Alpine, XKE Coup, Alfa Romeo, Porsche 911, Miata, RX-7. To mention only a few.

None of the others tail would break as suddenly as Sk2. Sk2 corrects very easily but it goes out even with a competent experienced driver.
Old 09-28-2004 | 10:16 AM
  #37  
kitwetzler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale
Default

quit complaining about it, get an alignment and check for the spring spacers. no one else has complained about this in the 04s, mine is considerably less tail happy than my 00.
Old 09-28-2004 | 10:32 AM
  #38  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Wow. I have a small bit of experience autocrossing an '86 911, and if you say your '04 is more oversteer prone than a 911, I think your S2000 is broken, because that absolutely should not be.

You also seem to suggest that your '04 is more oversteer prone than your '01. Again, that absolutely should not be.

Seriously - have you checked for spring spacers? It's easy to do.

ps - can you describe WHY there is "no screaming adrenalin hit"?
Old 09-28-2004 | 10:35 AM
  #39  
BioBanker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,704
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by PLYRS 3,Sep 27 2004, 02:32 PM
actually, it is....

(i'm gay...you ok with that lover??)

I know this guy.

He REALLY is as gay as they come. Total friend of Dorothy, her BEST friend in fact.

Cant drive either.
Old 09-28-2004 | 10:41 AM
  #40  
bigworm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: saratoga springs
Default

I have owned both cars, the 2 and the 2.2. The 04 does take a while to get use to. The things I notice the most are the slower stearing, softer rear shocks, and an easier clutch(softer).
The acceleration is just as fun if not better in the 04. I raced my friend when I had my 02 and he had his 04. I was in front of him so I got the jump. I had a cai, invidia exhaust, no spare, and could not pull an inch on him from 40mph up to around 100mph. It looked like he was waiting for me to get out of his way. He was stock, less than 1000 miles on the odometer, and had the spare with about another 100 lbs of stuff in the trunk. Sure you need to up shift sooner, but I do feel the power coming on more below the 6k changeover than I did with the pre04. I often find myself spending more time below below 6k in the 04 becuase the power is there.
Overall, I am happy with my decision. Dont get me wrong, I do miss the 9k shift, but overall I think the my04 is a better car. Get an aem cai and tell me vtech isnt fun!!! We all know the my04 s looks better. Bottom line, they are both great cars.

scott


Quick Reply: Not Happy With My '04



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 AM.