Least problematic year s2k?
#1
Least problematic year s2k?
I know s2k's are fairly reliable, I'm looking at 03 and 04's, and I really think I like the AP2 changes. Any known problems with 04's? any advantage disadvantage to lean either way? Like I said, I like the AP2 changes, so i'm leaning towards the 04. Assuming its got around 25k on it, the only big upcoming maintenance would the the clutch(around $1200) at around 60k right? and tires of course. No timing belt or any other big upcoming expenses right?
-Matt
-Matt
#3
Originally Posted by mlane302,Dec 27 2006, 08:50 PM
I know s2k's are fairly reliable, I'm looking at 03 and 04's, and I really think I like the AP2 changes. Any known problems with 04's? any advantage disadvantage to lean either way? Like I said, I like the AP2 changes, so i'm leaning towards the 04. Assuming its got around 25k on it, the only big upcoming maintenance would the the clutch(around $1200) at around 60k right? and tires of course. No timing belt or any other big upcoming expenses right?
-Matt
-Matt
#5
Agree with Quikag. Since the S is basically the same car that it was in 2000, each year brings improvements from Honda to correct minor problems that only show up after many miles and many users have noted the weak points. The '07 should be the best yet.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by tbonesteak,Dec 28 2006, 01:53 AM
07 ftw!!!! hehe jkjk. All years are good but personally, i would stay away from 99-01. 02+ should be good for me.
#10
Originally Posted by JackS,Dec 28 2006, 01:44 AM
Since the S is basically the same car that it was in 2000, each year brings improvements from Honda to correct minor problems that only show up after many miles and many users have noted the weak points.
Honda seems to do a good job at learning from repair history and correcting in future production.
Although, some of their solutions are not so great...like the ap2 clutch delay valve.