S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Lame car "reviewer" slams the S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-20-2012 | 05:24 PM
  #11  
teamvalorracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by JFUSION
His mind was made up before he even drove the car, he had no intention of keeping an open mind.
Exactly!
Old 04-20-2012 | 05:29 PM
  #12  
teamvalorracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by rob-2
What should we do about it?
Whatever you want.

I just found it interesting since the "mission" of the site is quoted as giving "truthful insight about cars". Thought others would get a kick out of how unbelievably bias that guy was, and how terribly incorrect he was about certain aspects.

But, you can shoot your gun in the air like an iraqi if you'd like.
Old 04-20-2012 | 05:38 PM
  #13  
teamvalorracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

I have a bachelors degree in human factors, so i am very well studied in ergonomics and facilitated instrinsic human attribution,and i love the layout of the S2000 interior, so what does that tell you? i use percentile scales, psychology and human thought processes when determing functionality and design cues. He used pure opinion and "taste". How is that what the site is supposed to stand for?

And regarding the last bit about the facts of the car; he cant bias stats, so he through that in at the last minute to make it so his review would even have a chance of being published. Then he kicks sand at the last second with his childish comment about the car screaming for forgiveness because of how terrible it is.

Lame.
Old 04-20-2012 | 06:10 PM
  #14  
TVPincDoc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 418
Likes: 2
From: Livermore
Default

Originally Posted by importkid
Jeremy Clarkson likes it. Nuff said.
About the only knocks that Top Gear had for the S2000 were related to the outrageous insurance and vehicle tax rates in Formerly-Great Britain.
Old 04-20-2012 | 06:31 PM
  #15  
solidol's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 412
Likes: 2
From: Fog City
Default

I find it fascinating somebody actually spent time writing whole pile of crap like that. I question why. We who love the car won't love it less after reading these illusional statements. New buyer - well there are not so many cars like this to choose from and yet S2000 falls into very special category. I test drove many cars over the years but nothing gives you that much of motoring experience for how much it costs. I owned it for two years now (for me that's a lot) and still every morning when I'm walking towards parked bundle of joy it still feels very special to me. Disregard what apparently incompetent and with lack of any design or mechanical sense person says. Enjoy the car, get prepped for weekend runs in the canyons or track and happy motoring everyone
Old 04-21-2012 | 10:20 AM
  #16  
Disgustipated's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 10
From: SoCal
Default

The best part about this review is that 8 years later, the S2000 is a sports car icon and modern classic, and "Robert Farago" is a no-name wannabe who was so terrible at reviewing cars that they got rid of him and his terrible writing.

Then, he went and started "The Truth About Guns" so he can rage and talk about shooting stuff to make himself feel better.

Also, in this review he just comes off as ignorant.

Above 5000rpms, well, that's a different story. I suppose the general idea is to hang on until 5850rpms, when the high-lift long duration cams come on song, then cane it to the 8000rpm redline. Two problems. One, the S2000's engine note lacks character, texture or tonality. And what it lacks it aural appeal, it makes up for with sheer volume. I reckon only a stone deaf driver could withstand the brutal din coming from the S2000's engine at full chat. North Korea uses less effective torture devices. Two, we're not talking about a nitrous-injection power boost. The additional hearing damage yields roughly 10% more go. So why bother? Shift at five and change and you're straight back into the meat of the powerband. Excluding a reverse gear that likes to play hide-and-seek, the S2000's six-speed gearbox offers nothing but quick slick shifts. So you can continue forward thrust without delay or diminution or waking every baby within two miles of your dual exhausts.
Doesn't the S2000 make an additional 70 whp or so VTEC engages and hits peak? Yeah, that sounds like 10% to me. What a smart little guy.
Old 04-21-2012 | 11:55 AM
  #17  
Jazzman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: N. Palm Beach, FL
Default

pay no attention to opinion unless it's backed with facts, then pay little attention, as facts can be skewed. I can make numbers dance


-m
Old 04-21-2012 | 08:51 PM
  #18  
whiteflash's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 23,911
Likes: 4
From: Benicia, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Disgustipated
Doesn't the S2000 make an additional 70 whp or so VTEC engages and hits peak? Yeah, that sounds like 10% to me. What a smart little guy.
"What a smart little guy," says the guy who's measuring the gain of VTEC by its engagement to end, and not by calculating the difference of power between lowcam to redline and highcam to redline.
Old 04-22-2012 | 03:47 PM
  #19  
g0g3tt4's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 2
From: Nor Cal (Humboldt, Ca)
Default

That guy is an idiot... and the comments below it say the same thing, but not as blunt.
Old 04-22-2012 | 06:35 PM
  #20  
Angelfire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Miami,Fl
Default

Originally Posted by importkid
Jeremy Clarkson likes it. Nuff said.
^this.


Quick Reply: Lame car "reviewer" slams the S2000



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 PM.